Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Agricultural Spraying Drones Through Fractional-Order PID Controllers and Genetic Algorithm

The viability of precision agriculture in family farming is intrinsically linked to the operational and energy efficiency of equipment, especially when relying on on-site renewable sources like photovoltaic panels. This paper addresses the challenge of maximizing the energy efficiency of spraying drones through advanced control optimization. The methodology employs a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to optimize and compare two controller types: a conventional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and a Fractional-Order PID (FOPID). The optimization aims to minimize a cost function that models energy consumptionand flight time. Simulation results demonstrate that the FOPID controller achieves a 3.1% reduction in operational cost per hectare compared to the conventional PID. Analysis of the acceleration profiles reveals that the FOPID, despite exhibiting high-frequency behavior, avoids the large-amplitude peaks characteristic of the PID, resulting in lower overall control effort and, consequently, reduced energy consumption. The study concludes that advanced software optimization, specifically with FOPID controllers, offers an energy-efficient solution that promotes sustainability in family farming.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17904788
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Agricultural Spraying Drones Through Fractional-Order PID Controllers and Genetic Algorithm

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Agricultural Spraying Drones Through Fractional-Order PID Controllers and Genetic Algorithm

article en

Abstract

The viability of precision agriculture in family farming is intrinsically linked to the operational and energy efficiency of equipment, especially when relying on on-site renewable sources like photovoltaic panels. This paper addresses the challenge of maximizing the energy efficiency of spraying drones through advanced control optimization. The methodology employs a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to optimize and compare two controller types: a conventional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and a Fractional-Order PID (FOPID). The optimization aims to minimize a cost function that models energy consumptionand flight time. Simulation results demonstrate that the FOPID controller achieves a 3.1% reduction in operational cost per hectare compared to the conventional PID. Analysis of the acceleration profiles reveals that the FOPID, despite exhibiting high-frequency behavior, avoids the large-amplitude peaks characteristic of the PID, resulting in lower overall control effort and, consequently, reduced energy consumption. The study concludes that advanced software optimization, specifically with FOPID controllers, offers an energy-efficient solution that promotes sustainability in family farming.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Agricultural Spraying Drones Through Fractional-Order PID Controllers and Genetic Algorithm · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS