Navigating Power in Participatory Process for Biodiversity Conservation: A Tool for Thought.

Participatory approaches are increasingly used in biodiversity conservation to build trust, reduce conflict, and create more lasting decisions. By bringing together diverse voices (local communities, scientists, policymakers, NGOs) they aim to shape strategies that protect both people and nature. But more participation does not automatically mean better outcomes. Power matters. When power dynamics are overlooked, participation can become superficial, reinforcing old inequalities and even deepening tensions. Power shapes who is heard, whose knowledge counts, and who is left outside decision-making. If we don’t name and reflect on these dynamics, we risk failing the very goals of fairness and impact that participatory processes aim for. This Tool for Thought invites conservation practitioners, researchers, and facilitators to reflect more consciously on how power operates in participatory settings and how we might respond with greater care and imagination. It introduces a shared vocabulary to talk about power clearly and constructively. It proposes key concepts, and reflective questions to help make powermore visible, more easy to talk about openly, and more actionable. This resource is for anyone who works, or aspires to work, at the intersection between biodiversity, participation, and social change.It speaks to: Conservation practitioners managing biodiversity and natural resources in collaboration with communities Researchers exploring biodiversity, social-ecological systems, and participatory approaches Facilitators designing and leading participatory processes across diverse settings But it also offers insights to those shaping the conditions for participation: Policy makers who commission participatory processes and seek to design them more inclusively Advocacy leaders, project designers, and funders thinking about how power affects whose voices are heard and whose knowledge is valued Institutional actors committed to shifting practices toward more equity, justice, and shared stewardship. Rather than offering strict categories, this Tool for Thought invites a moreluid perspective: wherever you sit on the ground, in research, at policy levels, or inbetween, you are part of shaping how power flows through conservation efforts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agritrop (Cirad)
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17911692
Primary Topic
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Power in Participatory Process for Biodiversity Conservation: A Tool for Thought.

Agritrop (Cirad)
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
article

Navigating Power in Participatory Process for Biodiversity Conservation: A Tool for Thought.

article en

Abstract

Participatory approaches are increasingly used in biodiversity conservation to build trust, reduce conflict, and create more lasting decisions. By bringing together diverse voices (local communities, scientists, policymakers, NGOs) they aim to shape strategies that protect both people and nature. But more participation does not automatically mean better outcomes. Power matters. When power dynamics are overlooked, participation can become superficial, reinforcing old inequalities and even deepening tensions. Power shapes who is heard, whose knowledge counts, and who is left outside decision-making. If we don’t name and reflect on these dynamics, we risk failing the very goals of fairness and impact that participatory processes aim for. This Tool for Thought invites conservation practitioners, researchers, and facilitators to reflect more consciously on how power operates in participatory settings and how we might respond with greater care and imagination. It introduces a shared vocabulary to talk about power clearly and constructively. It proposes key concepts, and reflective questions to help make powermore visible, more easy to talk about openly, and more actionable. This resource is for anyone who works, or aspires to work, at the intersection between biodiversity, participation, and social change.It speaks to: Conservation practitioners managing biodiversity and natural resources in collaboration with communities Researchers exploring biodiversity, social-ecological systems, and participatory approaches Facilitators designing and leading participatory processes across diverse settings But it also offers insights to those shaping the conditions for participation: Policy makers who commission participatory processes and seek to design them more inclusively Advocacy leaders, project designers, and funders thinking about how power affects whose voices are heard and whose knowledge is valued Institutional actors committed to shifting practices toward more equity, justice, and shared stewardship. Rather than offering strict categories, this Tool for Thought invites a moreluid perspective: wherever you sit on the ground, in research, at policy levels, or inbetween, you are part of shaping how power flows through conservation efforts.

Agritrop (Cirad)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Sussex (GB), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (NE), Qi2 (US), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), The Dialogue (US), Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité (FR), Flow Analysis (United States) (US), Dynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers (FR), Institut des langues et cultures d'Europe, Amérique, Afrique, Asie et Australie (FR), Cawthron Institute (NZ), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Université de Franche-Comté (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.