Navigating the Aftermath: Crisis Communication Strategies of Muslim Organizations in the Wake of Terror Attacks Conducted by Islamist Fundamentalists

This study seeks to improve our understanding of effective crisis communication of Muslim organizations after terror attacks using real-world examples as stimuli. Actual public statements issued by Muslim organizations in response to the terror attack conducted by Islamist fundamentalists in Berlin in 2016 were used. After presenting these statements, participants completed a survey assessing perceptions of the statements, specifically focusing on the degree of distancing from the perpetrator, the emphasis on societal commitment, and the emotional framing of the statements. Additionally, the survey measured the extent to which respondents attributed responsibility for the terrorist attack to the Muslim organization, as well as their broader perceptions of the Muslim organization, Muslims in general, and Islam. Our results show that especially emphasizing societal commitment has a positive effect on public perception, whereas distancing and message framing have lower impact. The present study underlines the importance of including attributed responsibility into the research framework.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251405569
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Aftermath: Crisis Communication Strategies of Muslim Organizations in the Wake of Terror Attacks Conducted by Islamist Fundamentalists

SAGE Open
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Navigating the Aftermath: Crisis Communication Strategies of Muslim Organizations in the Wake of Terror Attacks Conducted by Islamist Fundamentalists

article en

Abstract

This study seeks to improve our understanding of effective crisis communication of Muslim organizations after terror attacks using real-world examples as stimuli. Actual public statements issued by Muslim organizations in response to the terror attack conducted by Islamist fundamentalists in Berlin in 2016 were used. After presenting these statements, participants completed a survey assessing perceptions of the statements, specifically focusing on the degree of distancing from the perpetrator, the emphasis on societal commitment, and the emotional framing of the statements. Additionally, the survey measured the extent to which respondents attributed responsibility for the terrorist attack to the Muslim organization, as well as their broader perceptions of the Muslim organization, Muslims in general, and Islam. Our results show that especially emphasizing societal commitment has a positive effect on public perception, whereas distancing and message framing have lower impact. The present study underlines the importance of including attributed responsibility into the research framework.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Hochschule Bremen (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), University of Twente (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.