The gradual denaturalization of confiscation in the European Union: between effectiveness and a departure from criminal law foundations

This paper explores the evolving legal framework of asset confiscation in the European Union, focusing on the systematic departure from its traditional foundations in criminal law. It traces the legislative development from extended confiscation, non-conviction-based confiscation, and third-party confiscation to the recently introduced confiscation of unexplained wealth under Directive 2024/1260. The analysis aims to demonstrate how a reform agenda driven by effectiveness has given rise to a strategic ambiguity surrounding the legal nature of confiscation. This, in turn, raises significant concerns regarding fundamental rights, legal coherence, and mutual trust among Member States, ultimately calling into question the legal certainty and rule-of-law compatibility of some aspects of the EU’s asset recovery policy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2025.18035
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The gradual denaturalization of confiscation in the European Union: between effectiveness and a departure from criminal law foundations

Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Criminal Law and Policy
article

The gradual denaturalization of confiscation in the European Union: between effectiveness and a departure from criminal law foundations

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the evolving legal framework of asset confiscation in the European Union, focusing on the systematic departure from its traditional foundations in criminal law. It traces the legislative development from extended confiscation, non-conviction-based confiscation, and third-party confiscation to the recently introduced confiscation of unexplained wealth under Directive 2024/1260. The analysis aims to demonstrate how a reform agenda driven by effectiveness has given rise to a strategic ambiguity surrounding the legal nature of confiscation. This, in turn, raises significant concerns regarding fundamental rights, legal coherence, and mutual trust among Member States, ultimately calling into question the legal certainty and rule-of-law compatibility of some aspects of the EU’s asset recovery policy.

Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.