Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment

Cable burial risk assessment (CBRA) defines minimum seabed burial depth of cables to avoid interaction with towed objects that penetrate the seabed, for example, drag embedment anchors (DEA). Recent physical modelling studies have shown that model anchors dragged in dry sand may penetrate to much greater depths in loose sand than current CBRA approaches predict. As other seabed penetrating objects (e.g. pipeline ploughs) have shown velocity or rate of pull dependent behaviour in saturated soils, it is necessary to check for similar rate-dependent penetration behaviour for DEAs. This is required to verify the effect of anchor drag rates in CBRA methods and the validity of previous modelling studies that differ in their findings from current CBRA. This study used model centrifuge tests of DEAs pulled at varying rates in saturated conditions. The result show that anchor penetration depths are reduced with increasing drag rates. The results also confirm that CBRA assumptions of anchor orientation are not consistent with observed behaviour and soil penetration factors require updating. The results suggest that CBRA approaches should also consider the drag speed of the penetration event as this may vary during emergency deployment or may be much lower where a vessel drifts at anchor.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Géotechnique Letters
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.25.00069
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment

Géotechnique Letters
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment

article en

Abstract

Cable burial risk assessment (CBRA) defines minimum seabed burial depth of cables to avoid interaction with towed objects that penetrate the seabed, for example, drag embedment anchors (DEA). Recent physical modelling studies have shown that model anchors dragged in dry sand may penetrate to much greater depths in loose sand than current CBRA approaches predict. As other seabed penetrating objects (e.g. pipeline ploughs) have shown velocity or rate of pull dependent behaviour in saturated soils, it is necessary to check for similar rate-dependent penetration behaviour for DEAs. This is required to verify the effect of anchor drag rates in CBRA methods and the validity of previous modelling studies that differ in their findings from current CBRA. This study used model centrifuge tests of DEAs pulled at varying rates in saturated conditions. The result show that anchor penetration depths are reduced with increasing drag rates. The results also confirm that CBRA assumptions of anchor orientation are not consistent with observed behaviour and soil penetration factors require updating. The results suggest that CBRA approaches should also consider the drag speed of the penetration event as this may vary during emergency deployment or may be much lower where a vessel drifts at anchor.

Géotechnique LettersVol. 16(1)
British Geological Survey (GB), University of Dundee (GB), Durham University (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of drag rates on drag embedment anchor penetration for cable burial risk assessment · Géotechnique Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS