Sociohydrological model structure deficiency assessment and hybrid model selection

Sociohydrology aims to deliver user-inspired solutions to water challenges, often through model-based understanding and simulation of local realities. However, sociohydrological modeling methodologies used to understand such complex human-water systems remain difficult to apply to many real-world case studies. Sociohydrological model predictions at daily to annual time scales of decision- making remain a challenge due to often difficult-to-acquire social sciences data, and missing or unknown feedbacks that lead to model structural errors, among other issues. This paper assesses and reduces model structural deficiencies of a smallholder sociohydrological (SH) model when applied to a case study of small-scale agricultural production in India, where variables from a farmer survey help alleviate structural deficiencies. A structural error model is proposed based on a regression model of nonlinear projection of the these variables to a Kernel space, called Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) based model. Based on this, a hybrid model that is a sum of the SH model and the structural error model is proposed. It offers significantly better yield predictions on ‘unseen’ (to the model) survey data than the SH only model. The hybrid model also performs better on yield prediction than a KPCA model alone, which predicts yields without any SH dynamics. This is because the hybrid model combines the structural error model that learns from the spatial pattern of observed yields with the temporal dynamics explained by the SH model alone. The results indicate that the structure of the SH model can be improved by further incorporation of irrigation and adaptive behaviour of farmers. • Farm survey identifies sociohydrological (SH) model deficiencies in yield predictions. • Mixed method of surveys and machine learning used to model SH structural errors. • Hybrid SH model predicts better than SH only and machine learning only models. • Structural errors arise due to absence of irrigation practices and farmer adaptations.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134748
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociohydrological model structure deficiency assessment and hybrid model selection

Journal of Hydrology
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Sociohydrological model structure deficiency assessment and hybrid model selection

article en

Abstract

Sociohydrology aims to deliver user-inspired solutions to water challenges, often through model-based understanding and simulation of local realities. However, sociohydrological modeling methodologies used to understand such complex human-water systems remain difficult to apply to many real-world case studies. Sociohydrological model predictions at daily to annual time scales of decision- making remain a challenge due to often difficult-to-acquire social sciences data, and missing or unknown feedbacks that lead to model structural errors, among other issues. This paper assesses and reduces model structural deficiencies of a smallholder sociohydrological (SH) model when applied to a case study of small-scale agricultural production in India, where variables from a farmer survey help alleviate structural deficiencies. A structural error model is proposed based on a regression model of nonlinear projection of the these variables to a Kernel space, called Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) based model. Based on this, a hybrid model that is a sum of the SH model and the structural error model is proposed. It offers significantly better yield predictions on ‘unseen’ (to the model) survey data than the SH only model. The hybrid model also performs better on yield prediction than a KPCA model alone, which predicts yields without any SH dynamics. This is because the hybrid model combines the structural error model that learns from the spatial pattern of observed yields with the temporal dynamics explained by the SH model alone. The results indicate that the structure of the SH model can be improved by further incorporation of irrigation and adaptive behaviour of farmers. • Farm survey identifies sociohydrological (SH) model deficiencies in yield predictions. • Mixed method of surveys and machine learning used to model SH structural errors. • Hybrid SH model predicts better than SH only and machine learning only models. • Structural errors arise due to absence of irrigation practices and farmer adaptations.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 666
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.