The impact of collaborating with prolific authors within a specific journal on researchers’ performance in that journal: a case study of <i>scientometrics</i>

Purpose Authors with a high publication output in a particular journal may be influential figures in their research field, demonstrating high productivity. Their frequent publishing behavior in a given journal at least reflects a submission preference, and whether this preference affects their collaborators’ research performance in that journal warrants attention. Design/methodology/approach In this study, we aim to examine the impact of collaboration with prolific authors within the SCIENTOMETRICS journal on an author’s research performance in the same journal. We identified 128 high-producing authors in SCIENTOMETRICS based on Price’s Law and located their collaborators. We then proposed collaboration indicators and publication indicators to measure collaboration and its impact. Subsequently, we conducted Spearman correlation analysis and employed a negative binomial regression model to analyze the relationship between collaboration and research performance. Findings Finally, we draw three observations: (1) The publications and academic impact of collaborators are significantly higher than those of non-collaborators. (2) The proportion of collaboration with prolific authors is negatively correlated with a collaborator’s publications and academic impact. This phenomenon suggests that collaborators with a high proportion of collaboration tend to have fewer publications. (3) The number of collaborating prolific authors and the stability of collaboration are positively correlated with a collaborator’s publications and academic impact. Originality/value Existing literature on submission behavior has primarily examined journal-level attributes (e.g. impact factor, scope), whereas the potential relationship between researchers’ prior publication history and subsequent submission choices remains understudied. In this context, studying the impact of collaborating with prolific authors within a specific journal on researchers’ performance in that journal provides valuable insights.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2025-0104
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of collaborating with prolific authors within a specific journal on researchers’ performance in that journal: a case study of scientometrics

Journal of Documentation
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

The impact of collaborating with prolific authors within a specific journal on researchers’ performance in that journal: a case study of scientometrics

article en

Abstract

Purpose Authors with a high publication output in a particular journal may be influential figures in their research field, demonstrating high productivity. Their frequent publishing behavior in a given journal at least reflects a submission preference, and whether this preference affects their collaborators’ research performance in that journal warrants attention. Design/methodology/approach In this study, we aim to examine the impact of collaboration with prolific authors within the SCIENTOMETRICS journal on an author’s research performance in the same journal. We identified 128 high-producing authors in SCIENTOMETRICS based on Price’s Law and located their collaborators. We then proposed collaboration indicators and publication indicators to measure collaboration and its impact. Subsequently, we conducted Spearman correlation analysis and employed a negative binomial regression model to analyze the relationship between collaboration and research performance. Findings Finally, we draw three observations: (1) The publications and academic impact of collaborators are significantly higher than those of non-collaborators. (2) The proportion of collaboration with prolific authors is negatively correlated with a collaborator’s publications and academic impact. This phenomenon suggests that collaborators with a high proportion of collaboration tend to have fewer publications. (3) The number of collaborating prolific authors and the stability of collaboration are positively correlated with a collaborator’s publications and academic impact. Originality/value Existing literature on submission behavior has primarily examined journal-level attributes (e.g. impact factor, scope), whereas the potential relationship between researchers’ prior publication history and subsequent submission choices remains understudied. In this context, studying the impact of collaborating with prolific authors within a specific journal on researchers’ performance in that journal provides valuable insights.

Journal of DocumentationVol. 82(1)
China Mobile (China) (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.