»Nothing about us without us«

Abstract The phrase »nothing about us without us« arose within the disability movement in South Africa during the 1990s, but in recent years it has become a rallying cry beyond this movement for all who experience marginalization regarding issues that directly affect them. Inherent to this cry is the call for participation in the radical sense – that the voices of those most affected be centered in any discourses, policies or actions that relate to their situation, rather than the voices of those speaking on »behalf of« these marginalized groups and individuals. Such radical notions of participation argue that there is a kind of »ventriloquism« when those specifically in the Global North speak on behalf of those in the Global South and that this is interrelated with notions of neocolonialism and white supremacy enmeshed within diakonia and development praxis. In this article the author will seek to explore these entanglements and propose ways in which this can be engaged in the context of faith-based development praxis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Berliner Theologische Zeitschrift
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bthz-2025-0007
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

»Nothing about us without us«

Berliner Theologische Zeitschrift
Religion, Society, and Development
article

»Nothing about us without us«

article en

Abstract

Abstract The phrase »nothing about us without us« arose within the disability movement in South Africa during the 1990s, but in recent years it has become a rallying cry beyond this movement for all who experience marginalization regarding issues that directly affect them. Inherent to this cry is the call for participation in the radical sense – that the voices of those most affected be centered in any discourses, policies or actions that relate to their situation, rather than the voices of those speaking on »behalf of« these marginalized groups and individuals. Such radical notions of participation argue that there is a kind of »ventriloquism« when those specifically in the Global North speak on behalf of those in the Global South and that this is interrelated with notions of neocolonialism and white supremacy enmeshed within diakonia and development praxis. In this article the author will seek to explore these entanglements and propose ways in which this can be engaged in the context of faith-based development praxis.

Berliner Theologische ZeitschriftVol. 42(1)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.