Philosophical and methodological stance of the DQ framework

The Diffusion Quantum (DQ) framework is proposed explicitly as a speculative but disciplined research programme, rather than as a fully established fundamental theory. Its primary ambition is exploratory: to provide a structured way of thinking about how information, coherence and geometry might be related at sub–Planckian scales, and how such structures could leave faint but observable imprints in systems ranging from entangled pairs to plasmas and astrophysical environments. From the outset, we do not assume that DQ in its present form is the “true ontology” of nature. Instead, we treat it as a working hypothesis about an extended configuration space , in which encodes geometric hidden variables or informational degrees of freedom beyond standard spacetime. In this view, the usual quantum formalism (QM/QFT) is regarded as an effective projection of a richer dynamics, but all existing empirical successes of quantum theory and relativity are taken as non–negotiable constraints that any DQ model must reproduce in the appropriate limits.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17905601
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philosophical and methodological stance of the DQ framework

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

Philosophical and methodological stance of the DQ framework

article en

Abstract

The Diffusion Quantum (DQ) framework is proposed explicitly as a speculative but disciplined research programme, rather than as a fully established fundamental theory. Its primary ambition is exploratory: to provide a structured way of thinking about how information, coherence and geometry might be related at sub–Planckian scales, and how such structures could leave faint but observable imprints in systems ranging from entangled pairs to plasmas and astrophysical environments. From the outset, we do not assume that DQ in its present form is the “true ontology” of nature. Instead, we treat it as a working hypothesis about an extended configuration space , in which encodes geometric hidden variables or informational degrees of freedom beyond standard spacetime. In this view, the usual quantum formalism (QM/QFT) is regarded as an effective projection of a richer dynamics, but all existing empirical successes of quantum theory and relativity are taken as non–negotiable constraints that any DQ model must reproduce in the appropriate limits.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oldham Council (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Philosophical and methodological stance of the DQ framework · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS