A comparative analysis of the concept of intention (niyyah) in the theory of planned behaviour and Islamic jurisprudence

This article compares the concept of intention (niyyah) in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) with its treatment in Islamic jurisprudence, assessing the capacity of TPB to reflect Islamic legal and spiritual dimensions. Using qualitative comparative analysis, it addresses four key questions concerning the definitions, epistemological bases, and practical implications of niyyah in both frameworks. The study finds that TPB conceptualises intention as a rational, cognitive predictor of behaviour, whereas Islamic jurisprudence regards niyyah as a legal and spiritual condition that determines the validity and reward of actions. The paper argues that TPB is inadequate in religious contexts and calls for a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah-based model that integrates theological, ethical, and behavioural elements. It recommends the contextual adaptation of behavioural theories, and the development of models rooted in Islamic epistemology

Publication Details

Journal
The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Published
2025-11-14
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of the concept of intention (niyyah) in the theory of planned behaviour and Islamic jurisprudence

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

A comparative analysis of the concept of intention (niyyah) in the theory of planned behaviour and Islamic jurisprudence

article en

Abstract

This article compares the concept of intention (niyyah) in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) with its treatment in Islamic jurisprudence, assessing the capacity of TPB to reflect Islamic legal and spiritual dimensions. Using qualitative comparative analysis, it addresses four key questions concerning the definitions, epistemological bases, and practical implications of niyyah in both frameworks. The study finds that TPB conceptualises intention as a rational, cognitive predictor of behaviour, whereas Islamic jurisprudence regards niyyah as a legal and spiritual condition that determines the validity and reward of actions. The paper argues that TPB is inadequate in religious contexts and calls for a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah-based model that integrates theological, ethical, and behavioural elements. It recommends the contextual adaptation of behavioural theories, and the development of models rooted in Islamic epistemology

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.