Silence on Xinjiang: Freedom of Expression on Chinese Social Media

This research investigates whether Chinese netizens possess the freedom to express political opinions, particularly opin­ions that disagree with the Chinese state media narrative on controversial news, due to the cybersecurity policies in place since President Xi Jinping came into power in 2012. Previ­ous literature notes how countries, with either democratic or authoritarian government models, have used fears of fake news to silence political commentary opposing the gov­ernment-curated view. Literature also observes the rise of self-censorship among netizens in response to government threats of punishment for violating censorship regulations. To discover the state of the global media narrative and the Chinese state media narrative, this research found patterns in topics and framing of articles from Chinese state-support­ed news agencies and independent global news agencies to represent each narrative. Using these narrative frames, this research thematically coded hundreds of social media posts from the Chinese social media site Weibo and the global social media site Twitter posted between 2012 and 2022 to determine which posts align with which narrative and if politics could be discussed freely on Chinese social media in comparison to global social media. This research project predicted netizens on Chinese social media would self-cen­sor political opinions opposing the Chinese state media narrative to avoid punishment. However, the overwhelm­ing lack of political discussion on Weibo made the reason behind the lack of data, either censorship or self-censorship, difficult to determine. Analyzing why netizens on Chinese social media cannot or do not discuss controversial politi­cal topics on Weibo can aid in the creation of new policies meant to reduce censorship in China and increase freedom of expression.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (University of Skopje)
Published
2025-12-11
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silence on Xinjiang: Freedom of Expression on Chinese Social Media

Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (University of Skopje)
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Silence on Xinjiang: Freedom of Expression on Chinese Social Media

article en

Abstract

This research investigates whether Chinese netizens possess the freedom to express political opinions, particularly opin­ions that disagree with the Chinese state media narrative on controversial news, due to the cybersecurity policies in place since President Xi Jinping came into power in 2012. Previ­ous literature notes how countries, with either democratic or authoritarian government models, have used fears of fake news to silence political commentary opposing the gov­ernment-curated view. Literature also observes the rise of self-censorship among netizens in response to government threats of punishment for violating censorship regulations. To discover the state of the global media narrative and the Chinese state media narrative, this research found patterns in topics and framing of articles from Chinese state-support­ed news agencies and independent global news agencies to represent each narrative. Using these narrative frames, this research thematically coded hundreds of social media posts from the Chinese social media site Weibo and the global social media site Twitter posted between 2012 and 2022 to determine which posts align with which narrative and if politics could be discussed freely on Chinese social media in comparison to global social media. This research project predicted netizens on Chinese social media would self-cen­sor political opinions opposing the Chinese state media narrative to avoid punishment. However, the overwhelm­ing lack of political discussion on Weibo made the reason behind the lack of data, either censorship or self-censorship, difficult to determine. Analyzing why netizens on Chinese social media cannot or do not discuss controversial politi­cal topics on Weibo can aid in the creation of new policies meant to reduce censorship in China and increase freedom of expression.

Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (University of Skopje)
University of Kansas (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.