Bridging IS and Project Management: A Framework for Understanding IS Project Specificity

This study investigates how academic literature justifies the distinctiveness of Information Systems (IS) projects. While often viewed as difficult to manage, there remains no shared understanding of what makes IS projects unique. Based on a structured review of 137 articles from leading project management journals, the paper synthesizes the main arguments describing their specificities. Using the theoretical lens of temporary organizations, justifications are mapped across five dimensions: Task, Team, Time, Transition, and Context. Beyond recurring themes—such as technological uncertainty, stakeholder complexity, and strategic embeddedness—the analysis reveals cross-dimensional patterns, including blurred boundaries between task and team or between project and organizational time. These features contribute to unstable coordination and temporal uncertainty. The study proposes a conceptual framework that clarifies the distinct nature of IS projects and encourages dialogue between IS and project management communities, offering a foundation for future theorizing on IS project dynamics in volatile environments.

Publication Details

Journal
R-libre (Université Téluq)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging IS and Project Management: A Framework for Understanding IS Project Specificity

R-libre (Université Téluq)
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Bridging IS and Project Management: A Framework for Understanding IS Project Specificity

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how academic literature justifies the distinctiveness of Information Systems (IS) projects. While often viewed as difficult to manage, there remains no shared understanding of what makes IS projects unique. Based on a structured review of 137 articles from leading project management journals, the paper synthesizes the main arguments describing their specificities. Using the theoretical lens of temporary organizations, justifications are mapped across five dimensions: Task, Team, Time, Transition, and Context. Beyond recurring themes—such as technological uncertainty, stakeholder complexity, and strategic embeddedness—the analysis reveals cross-dimensional patterns, including blurred boundaries between task and team or between project and organizational time. These features contribute to unstable coordination and temporal uncertainty. The study proposes a conceptual framework that clarifies the distinct nature of IS projects and encourages dialogue between IS and project management communities, offering a foundation for future theorizing on IS project dynamics in volatile environments.

R-libre (Université Téluq)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.