What is a Good Way to Ask About Racist Experiences? Exploring the Gap Between Direct and Indirect Measures

Surveying racist attitudes and actions has shifted from using direct to using indirect measures. However, investigating the different forms of racist attitudes and actions has yet to translate into the measurement of racist experiences. This poses a challenge for capturing the prevalence of racist experiences amidst divergent patterns of racist attitudes and actions. To address this gap, we conducted a comparative analysis of two instruments: a direct and an indirect measure of racist experiences. We aimed at determining the prevalence of racist experiences using both of these instruments, as well as identifying differences in reporting among respondents. Our findings indicate that the instruments yield different prevalence rates, with the indirect instrument reporting a higher prevalence. Additionally, based on the indirect measure, men, younger respondents and immigrants are more likely to report racism, while the level of respondents’ education had no discernible effect on the measurement.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is a Good Way to Ask About Racist Experiences? Exploring the Gap Between Direct and Indirect Measures

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

What is a Good Way to Ask About Racist Experiences? Exploring the Gap Between Direct and Indirect Measures

article en

Abstract

Surveying racist attitudes and actions has shifted from using direct to using indirect measures. However, investigating the different forms of racist attitudes and actions has yet to translate into the measurement of racist experiences. This poses a challenge for capturing the prevalence of racist experiences amidst divergent patterns of racist attitudes and actions. To address this gap, we conducted a comparative analysis of two instruments: a direct and an indirect measure of racist experiences. We aimed at determining the prevalence of racist experiences using both of these instruments, as well as identifying differences in reporting among respondents. Our findings indicate that the instruments yield different prevalence rates, with the indirect instrument reporting a higher prevalence. Additionally, based on the indirect measure, men, younger respondents and immigrants are more likely to report racism, while the level of respondents’ education had no discernible effect on the measurement.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Leibniz Institute for the German Language (DE), German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DE), The Expert Council of German Foundations on Integration and Migration (DE), German Center for Integration and Migration Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.