Comparing Successive Collision Theory and The Lambda -CDM model

Every improvement in our ability to peer deeper and farther into the history of our cosmos brings new inconsistencies between prediction and observation. Our newest telescopes, instead of making things clearer, only bring more confusion to a model that, for all of its grandeur, is really being held together by assumptions and band-aids. When we remove the assumptions of a hot dense center or starting singularity, the notions of finite time or finite space, the idea that our "big bang" create the entirety of everything, then we can begin to see how a far cleaner explanation for the chain of events that forged our infinitesimal patch of spacetime evolves naturally out the field equations of the general theory of relativity. When we examine what those equations tell us when applied to the eternal time and infinite space, we do not get inflating bubble universes. Instead, we see a nested succession of comoving frames of reference, siblings all sharing in the journey of their most massive peer(s), creating larger and larger nested structures. There is absolutely zero reason to assume if our universe is truly homogenous and isotropic, this hierarchy would not continue beyond our cosmic horizon, creating vast structures far removed from our scale factor. In this almost certain scenario, the cosmic speed limit that dictates the maximum speed our planet could be accelerated to within our nested succession of parent frames of reference has no bearing on the maximum speed that two nested succession of comoving frames of references that are tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of nested parent frames above the frame where our visible universe is in orbit and possibly being orbited. When we remove the hot dense center origin in place of the far more likely succession of superluminal collisions, it is amazing the number of issues that the Lambda-CDM model struggles to explain that are simple predictions of SCT and its corollaries. Over forty-five years of research fine-tuning the concepts of Successive Collision Theory have provided me the ability to present this very bold worksheet of where SCT outperforms the Lambda-CDM big bang model in its attempt to all-inclusively answer every mystery thrown at it. #thenaturalstateofnature#aleapyearcrossinglightyears

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17891245
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Successive Collision Theory and The Lambda -CDM model

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Comparing Successive Collision Theory and The Lambda -CDM model

article en

Abstract

Every improvement in our ability to peer deeper and farther into the history of our cosmos brings new inconsistencies between prediction and observation. Our newest telescopes, instead of making things clearer, only bring more confusion to a model that, for all of its grandeur, is really being held together by assumptions and band-aids. When we remove the assumptions of a hot dense center or starting singularity, the notions of finite time or finite space, the idea that our "big bang" create the entirety of everything, then we can begin to see how a far cleaner explanation for the chain of events that forged our infinitesimal patch of spacetime evolves naturally out the field equations of the general theory of relativity. When we examine what those equations tell us when applied to the eternal time and infinite space, we do not get inflating bubble universes. Instead, we see a nested succession of comoving frames of reference, siblings all sharing in the journey of their most massive peer(s), creating larger and larger nested structures. There is absolutely zero reason to assume if our universe is truly homogenous and isotropic, this hierarchy would not continue beyond our cosmic horizon, creating vast structures far removed from our scale factor. In this almost certain scenario, the cosmic speed limit that dictates the maximum speed our planet could be accelerated to within our nested succession of parent frames of reference has no bearing on the maximum speed that two nested succession of comoving frames of references that are tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of nested parent frames above the frame where our visible universe is in orbit and possibly being orbited. When we remove the hot dense center origin in place of the far more likely succession of superluminal collisions, it is amazing the number of issues that the Lambda-CDM model struggles to explain that are simple predictions of SCT and its corollaries. Over forty-five years of research fine-tuning the concepts of Successive Collision Theory have provided me the ability to present this very bold worksheet of where SCT outperforms the Lambda-CDM big bang model in its attempt to all-inclusively answer every mystery thrown at it. #thenaturalstateofnature#aleapyearcrossinglightyears

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.