Capital Gains Tax and Bankruptcy: A Minefield for Trustees in Bankruptcy

The imposition of capital gains tax on trustees in bankruptcy has become a contentious issue following the Federal Court’s decision in Robson as trustee for the bankrupt estate of Lanning v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 720. Historically, trustees in bankruptcy were not held liable for capital gains tax on asset disposals during bankruptcy; rather, the liability was attributed to the bankrupt individual. However, the court’s interpretation of s 254 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) has altered the established position, making trustees in bankruptcy personally liable for CGT arising from post-appointment disposals. This article examines the shift in legal interpretation by analysing the rationale in Robson and its departure from established practice. It further discusses the practical challenges and commercial implications of the decision, and identifies strategies adopted by trustees to mitigate personal liability, including reliance on pre-appointment disposals. Ultimately, this article concludes that reform is required to address the inequities and inefficiencies arising from the Robson decision, in order to ensure the fair and efficient administration of bankrupt estates.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bond Law Review
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.154264
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capital Gains Tax and Bankruptcy: A Minefield for Trustees in Bankruptcy

Bond Law Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Capital Gains Tax and Bankruptcy: A Minefield for Trustees in Bankruptcy

article en

Abstract

The imposition of capital gains tax on trustees in bankruptcy has become a contentious issue following the Federal Court’s decision in Robson as trustee for the bankrupt estate of Lanning v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 720. Historically, trustees in bankruptcy were not held liable for capital gains tax on asset disposals during bankruptcy; rather, the liability was attributed to the bankrupt individual. However, the court’s interpretation of s 254 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) has altered the established position, making trustees in bankruptcy personally liable for CGT arising from post-appointment disposals. This article examines the shift in legal interpretation by analysing the rationale in Robson and its departure from established practice. It further discusses the practical challenges and commercial implications of the decision, and identifies strategies adopted by trustees to mitigate personal liability, including reliance on pre-appointment disposals. Ultimately, this article concludes that reform is required to address the inequities and inefficiencies arising from the Robson decision, in order to ensure the fair and efficient administration of bankrupt estates.

Bond Law ReviewVol. 37(2)
Bond University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Capital Gains Tax and Bankruptcy: A Minefield for Trustees in Bankruptcy · Bond Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS