Bricklayers’ perspectives on human-robot collaboration (HRC) in on-site masonry construction: opportunities, challenges, and considerations

Purpose The Australian construction sector is experiencing historically low productivity rates, labour shortages and increased building costs. In bricklaying, highly automated industrial robotic solutions have not alleviated these challenges. Recent advances raise the opportunity for less costly, modular and safer collaborative robots (cobots) extended through augmented reality (AR). This study aims to understand bricklayers’ perspectives on working with cobots and AR; identify the opportunities and challenges for cobot integration on-site; and identify key considerations for on-site human–robot collaboration (HRC). Design/methodology/approach This study draws upon seven face-to-face semi-structured interviews with Australian bricklayers, including cobot users and non-users. A codebook-informed reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) resulted in three key themes. Findings The findings reveal a vital need for human-centred HRC workflows tailored to residential bricklaying. Theme 1 identifies HRC workflows as an enabler to address labour shortages and low productivity, increase workforce diversity and ultimately preserve the profession’s longevity. Theme 2 suggests HRC workflows must overcome site integration, safety and usability challenges. Theme 3 addresses design considerations for successful on-site cobot deployment. Complementary AR enhances collaboration by leveraging human capabilities combined with machine assistance. Originality/value Aligning the findings with the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study uncovers bricklayer perceptions and attitudes towards working with cobots and AR devices on-site. It outlines the challenges bricklayers’ encounter with an existing assistive robot system and key considerations for HRC workflows. Future research will focus on collaborating with bricklayers to design human-centred HRC workflows to improve adoption in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) sector.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction Innovation
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-04-2025-0186
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bricklayers’ perspectives on human-robot collaboration (HRC) in on-site masonry construction: opportunities, challenges, and considerations

Construction Innovation
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Bricklayers’ perspectives on human-robot collaboration (HRC) in on-site masonry construction: opportunities, challenges, and considerations

article en

Abstract

Purpose The Australian construction sector is experiencing historically low productivity rates, labour shortages and increased building costs. In bricklaying, highly automated industrial robotic solutions have not alleviated these challenges. Recent advances raise the opportunity for less costly, modular and safer collaborative robots (cobots) extended through augmented reality (AR). This study aims to understand bricklayers’ perspectives on working with cobots and AR; identify the opportunities and challenges for cobot integration on-site; and identify key considerations for on-site human–robot collaboration (HRC). Design/methodology/approach This study draws upon seven face-to-face semi-structured interviews with Australian bricklayers, including cobot users and non-users. A codebook-informed reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) resulted in three key themes. Findings The findings reveal a vital need for human-centred HRC workflows tailored to residential bricklaying. Theme 1 identifies HRC workflows as an enabler to address labour shortages and low productivity, increase workforce diversity and ultimately preserve the profession’s longevity. Theme 2 suggests HRC workflows must overcome site integration, safety and usability challenges. Theme 3 addresses design considerations for successful on-site cobot deployment. Complementary AR enhances collaboration by leveraging human capabilities combined with machine assistance. Originality/value Aligning the findings with the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study uncovers bricklayer perceptions and attitudes towards working with cobots and AR devices on-site. It outlines the challenges bricklayers’ encounter with an existing assistive robot system and key considerations for HRC workflows. Future research will focus on collaborating with bricklayers to design human-centred HRC workflows to improve adoption in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) sector.

Construction InnovationVol. 25(7)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Australian Centre for Robotic Vision (AU), ResearchWorks (United States) (US), MathWorks (United States) (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.