Humanitarian Dimensions of the Islamic Law of War: The Case of Prisoners of War

This qualitative study will be trying to explore the humanitarian aspects of Islamic law of war (Siyar) regarding prisoners of war (POWs) with the help of a comparison with international humanitarian law (IHL), especially the Geneva Conventions. Based on classical Islamic jurisprudence of the four major Sunni schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) and modern literature, this paper examines the convergence and divergence between Islamic and international legal rules involving treatment of POWs. By using a systemic analysis of primary Islamic sources, the Quran, Hadith, and works of classical jurists, and through comparing Geneva Convention III, this study finds a significant overlap in the principles of humanitarianism, and identifies methodological differences. Results indicate that the two systems have underlying similarities in their dedication to humane treatment, protection of civilians, and controlled disposal of prisoners, but these differ in the outcomes and permissible actions that can be implemented. This paper builds upon the literature of legal pluralism by showing that the classical Islamic standards of humanitarianism have directions for the modern POW protection debate. The study has important suggestions to harmonization of international law, military pedagogy in Muslim predominant countries and humanitarian interfaith dialogue.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17899645
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humanitarian Dimensions of the Islamic Law of War: The Case of Prisoners of War

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Law and Human Rights
article

Humanitarian Dimensions of the Islamic Law of War: The Case of Prisoners of War

article en

Abstract

This qualitative study will be trying to explore the humanitarian aspects of Islamic law of war (Siyar) regarding prisoners of war (POWs) with the help of a comparison with international humanitarian law (IHL), especially the Geneva Conventions. Based on classical Islamic jurisprudence of the four major Sunni schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) and modern literature, this paper examines the convergence and divergence between Islamic and international legal rules involving treatment of POWs. By using a systemic analysis of primary Islamic sources, the Quran, Hadith, and works of classical jurists, and through comparing Geneva Convention III, this study finds a significant overlap in the principles of humanitarianism, and identifies methodological differences. Results indicate that the two systems have underlying similarities in their dedication to humane treatment, protection of civilians, and controlled disposal of prisoners, but these differ in the outcomes and permissible actions that can be implemented. This paper builds upon the literature of legal pluralism by showing that the classical Islamic standards of humanitarianism have directions for the modern POW protection debate. The study has important suggestions to harmonization of international law, military pedagogy in Muslim predominant countries and humanitarian interfaith dialogue.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Islamic University Chittagong (BD)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.