Film mulching synergistically enhances water productivity and crop yield in maize-soybean intercropping

Water scarcity and limited arable land availability constrain dryland agriculture, requiring optimized resource allocation to achieve sustainable production. Film mulching and intercropping are widely applied as solutions to water and land constraints in dryland farming, but their synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Therefore, five treatments with different planting patterns were tested in this study: monoculture maize without mulching, monoculture maize with mulching, monoculture soybean without mulching, maize–soybean intercropping without mulching, and maize–soybean intercropping with mulching in the maize strip. The soil water dynamics, crop growth dynamics, root system characteristics and root–shoot coordination, water productivity (WP c ), land equivalent ratio (LER), and economic benefits were analyzed. Intercropping with mulching enhanced the resource use efficiency and reduced the risk due to yield variability. Intercropping significantly increased the soil water storage (at 120–200 cm) at harvest, lowering the drought risk compared with monoculture. The system adapted to late-growth water stress through increases in the deep-root density in maize and optimizing the maize–soybean root–shoot ratio, while mulching conserved moisture in the topsoil (0–40 cm) early. Their synergy enhanced WP c by 4.66 % and LER was 1.46. Mulched intercropping also compensated for the yield losses under no mulching, increasing the total production by 10.65–27.75 % and economic returns by 8.10–29.07 %. Intercropping with plastic film mulching can optimize the use of soil and water resources and achieves synergies to establish a sustainable cropping system that facilitates water conservation, yield increases, and efficiency improvements in dryland farming areas. • Intercropping mitigates deep soil desiccation (120–200 cm) compared to sole maize. • Intercropping enhances maize RLD in deep soil layers and optimizes root-shoot ratios. • Under drought, mulched intercropping offsets yield penalties typical of non-mulched. • Mulched intercropping achieves a LER of 1.46 while boosting WP c in dryland farming.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.110072
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Film mulching synergistically enhances water productivity and crop yield in maize-soybean intercropping

2 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
article

Film mulching synergistically enhances water productivity and crop yield in maize-soybean intercropping

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Water scarcity and limited arable land availability constrain dryland agriculture, requiring optimized resource allocation to achieve sustainable production. Film mulching and intercropping are widely applied as solutions to water and land constraints in dryland farming, but their synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Therefore, five treatments with different planting patterns were tested in this study: monoculture maize without mulching, monoculture maize with mulching, monoculture soybean without mulching, maize–soybean intercropping without mulching, and maize–soybean intercropping with mulching in the maize strip. The soil water dynamics, crop growth dynamics, root system characteristics and root–shoot coordination, water productivity (WP c ), land equivalent ratio (LER), and economic benefits were analyzed. Intercropping with mulching enhanced the resource use efficiency and reduced the risk due to yield variability. Intercropping significantly increased the soil water storage (at 120–200 cm) at harvest, lowering the drought risk compared with monoculture. The system adapted to late-growth water stress through increases in the deep-root density in maize and optimizing the maize–soybean root–shoot ratio, while mulching conserved moisture in the topsoil (0–40 cm) early. Their synergy enhanced WP c by 4.66 % and LER was 1.46. Mulched intercropping also compensated for the yield losses under no mulching, increasing the total production by 10.65–27.75 % and economic returns by 8.10–29.07 %. Intercropping with plastic film mulching can optimize the use of soil and water resources and achieves synergies to establish a sustainable cropping system that facilitates water conservation, yield increases, and efficiency improvements in dryland farming areas. • Intercropping mitigates deep soil desiccation (120–200 cm) compared to sole maize. • Intercropping enhances maize RLD in deep soil layers and optimizes root-shoot ratios. • Under drought, mulched intercropping offsets yield penalties typical of non-mulched. • Mulched intercropping achieves a LER of 1.46 while boosting WP c in dryland farming.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 323
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.