Perspectives of Non-Medical Professionals Working in a Mental Health Service on Eating Disorders: Awareness, Knowledge, and Stigmatisation

<b>Background</b>: Eating disorders (EDs) are serious mental health conditions often beginning in adolescence and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although previous research has focused on medical staff, little is known about how EDs are recognised and managed by non-medical mental health professionals within community-based systems. This study examined their awareness, knowledge, and stigmatising beliefs toward EDs in Türkiye, highlighting implications for training and policy development. <b>Methods</b>: A study-specific questionnaire adapted from a validated tool previously used with general practitioners was administered to 42 non-medical professionals (95.2% female; mean age = 33.2 ± 5.6 years) working in community mental health services in Ankara, Türkiye. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six clinical vignettes depicting a young person with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), depression, or type-1 diabetes. The questionnaire assessed illness perception, causal attributions, emotional reactions, professional knowledge, and stigmatising beliefs. <b>Results</b>: Only 28.6% (<i>n</i> = 12) correctly identified the disorder in their assigned vignette. BED had the highest diagnostic accuracy (50%), while AN and ARFID were most frequently misidentified. Participants commonly believed that EDs mainly affected females, had a short duration, and were less responsive to treatment. Stigmatising beliefs-such as personal blame-were also noted. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings revealed limited awareness and knowledge of EDs-particularly AN and ARFID-among non-medical mental health professionals. Misconceptions that EDs are self-inflicted may delay recognition and referral. The results underscore the need for targeted education, anti-stigma interventions, and integration of ED content into professional training to improve early detection and community-based support.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243878
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of Non-Medical Professionals Working in a Mental Health Service on Eating Disorders: Awareness, Knowledge, and Stigmatisation

Nutrients
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Perspectives of Non-Medical Professionals Working in a Mental Health Service on Eating Disorders: Awareness, Knowledge, and Stigmatisation

article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Eating disorders (EDs) are serious mental health conditions often beginning in adolescence and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although previous research has focused on medical staff, little is known about how EDs are recognised and managed by non-medical mental health professionals within community-based systems. This study examined their awareness, knowledge, and stigmatising beliefs toward EDs in Türkiye, highlighting implications for training and policy development. <b>Methods</b>: A study-specific questionnaire adapted from a validated tool previously used with general practitioners was administered to 42 non-medical professionals (95.2% female; mean age = 33.2 ± 5.6 years) working in community mental health services in Ankara, Türkiye. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six clinical vignettes depicting a young person with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), depression, or type-1 diabetes. The questionnaire assessed illness perception, causal attributions, emotional reactions, professional knowledge, and stigmatising beliefs. <b>Results</b>: Only 28.6% (<i>n</i> = 12) correctly identified the disorder in their assigned vignette. BED had the highest diagnostic accuracy (50%), while AN and ARFID were most frequently misidentified. Participants commonly believed that EDs mainly affected females, had a short duration, and were less responsive to treatment. Stigmatising beliefs-such as personal blame-were also noted. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings revealed limited awareness and knowledge of EDs-particularly AN and ARFID-among non-medical mental health professionals. Misconceptions that EDs are self-inflicted may delay recognition and referral. The results underscore the need for targeted education, anti-stigma interventions, and integration of ED content into professional training to improve early detection and community-based support.

NutrientsVol. 17(24)
University College Dublin (IE), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR), Association of Child Psychotherapists (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.