LCA studies of fruit and vegetables production, storage and transportation using different packagings in consideration of food waste and energy consumption

Packaging significantly affects the loss and waste rate of fresh fruit and vegetables (FV), and thus the environmental impact. The usage of reusable plastic crate (RPC) can reduce food loss and waste (FLW), energy consumption, and thus the relevant environmental impact. However, studies combining FV and all these considerations are limited. This article applies life cycle assessment (LCA), from farm to store shelf, to evaluate the environmental impact of FV and their packaging, including Global Warming Potential (GWP), Freshwater Eutrophication Potential (EP), Freshwater Ecotoxicity Potential (FETP) and Water consumption Potential (WCP). It shows that the RPC usage can significantly reduce environmental impacts. Considering the food loss and waste reduction and energy optimisation brought by RPC usage, RPC usage can reduce GWP increase by 32.36 %–50.38 % as compared to cardboard (CB) packaging, FETP by 3.1 %–16.8 %, EP by 1.9 %–13.4 % and WCP by 3.4 %–16.9 %. The most notable reduction in GWP and FETP is observed for cabbage among the selected FV due to the highest loss rate. When combining food and packaging two life cycles together, the RPC usage can reduce GWP by 4.50 %–16.61 % compared to CB, . Electricity and FLW rate are identified as highly sensitive factors to total environmental impact, while electricity and fertilizer demonstrated a high sensitivity for GWP and FETP, respectively. The study shows that RPC has coupling advantages over CB in terms of indirect and direct impacts on GHG emissions and other environmental impacts. The results support a further deployment of RPC as a means to reduce the environmental influence and waste. • Reusable plastic crate (RPC) reduces Global Warming Potential (GWP) compared to cardboard packaging. • The reduction of CO 2 emissions using RPC can be enhanced by considering food loss and energy use. • Cucumber has the highest GWP compared to other investigated fruit and vegetables without packaging. • Using RPC has the most positive impact on cabbage-related CO 2 emissions among all investigated fruit and vegetables. • Electricity and fertilizer use are key sensitivity factors that influence GWP and Freshwater Ecotoxicity Potential (FETP).

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108702
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LCA studies of fruit and vegetables production, storage and transportation using different packagings in consideration of food waste and energy consumption

Biomass and Bioenergy
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

LCA studies of fruit and vegetables production, storage and transportation using different packagings in consideration of food waste and energy consumption

article en

Abstract

Packaging significantly affects the loss and waste rate of fresh fruit and vegetables (FV), and thus the environmental impact. The usage of reusable plastic crate (RPC) can reduce food loss and waste (FLW), energy consumption, and thus the relevant environmental impact. However, studies combining FV and all these considerations are limited. This article applies life cycle assessment (LCA), from farm to store shelf, to evaluate the environmental impact of FV and their packaging, including Global Warming Potential (GWP), Freshwater Eutrophication Potential (EP), Freshwater Ecotoxicity Potential (FETP) and Water consumption Potential (WCP). It shows that the RPC usage can significantly reduce environmental impacts. Considering the food loss and waste reduction and energy optimisation brought by RPC usage, RPC usage can reduce GWP increase by 32.36 %–50.38 % as compared to cardboard (CB) packaging, FETP by 3.1 %–16.8 %, EP by 1.9 %–13.4 % and WCP by 3.4 %–16.9 %. The most notable reduction in GWP and FETP is observed for cabbage among the selected FV due to the highest loss rate. When combining food and packaging two life cycles together, the RPC usage can reduce GWP by 4.50 %–16.61 % compared to CB, . Electricity and FLW rate are identified as highly sensitive factors to total environmental impact, while electricity and fertilizer demonstrated a high sensitivity for GWP and FETP, respectively. The study shows that RPC has coupling advantages over CB in terms of indirect and direct impacts on GHG emissions and other environmental impacts. The results support a further deployment of RPC as a means to reduce the environmental influence and waste. • Reusable plastic crate (RPC) reduces Global Warming Potential (GWP) compared to cardboard packaging. • The reduction of CO 2 emissions using RPC can be enhanced by considering food loss and energy use. • Cucumber has the highest GWP compared to other investigated fruit and vegetables without packaging. • Using RPC has the most positive impact on cabbage-related CO 2 emissions among all investigated fruit and vegetables. • Electricity and fertilizer use are key sensitivity factors that influence GWP and Freshwater Ecotoxicity Potential (FETP).

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 208
European Commission
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LCA studies of fruit and vegetables production, storage and transportation using different packagings in consideration of food waste and energy consumption · Biomass and Bioenergy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS