Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmia disorder and a major cause of sudden cardiac death below 50 years. Despite more than three decades of research, diagnosis and risk prediction remain challenging due to variable presentation and incomplete understanding of its genetic basis. The Brugada electrocardiographic pattern is central to diagnosis but lacks specificity, while different scoring systems offer structured assessment yet perform inconsistently in asymptomatic or intermediate-risk patients. <i>SCN5A</i> is the only gene with definitive evidence for causality, but incomplete penetrance and polygenic effects limit its clinical utility. Important gaps remain, including the low diagnostic yield of genetic testing, the unclear course of asymptomatic BrS patients with spontaneous type I electrocardiographic pattern and in geno-negative BrS patients, and the limited validation of current risk models. In this mini review, we explore these challenges and discuss new directions, that could move the field toward more accurate and personalized management.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1722105
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome

article en

Abstract

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmia disorder and a major cause of sudden cardiac death below 50 years. Despite more than three decades of research, diagnosis and risk prediction remain challenging due to variable presentation and incomplete understanding of its genetic basis. The Brugada electrocardiographic pattern is central to diagnosis but lacks specificity, while different scoring systems offer structured assessment yet perform inconsistently in asymptomatic or intermediate-risk patients. <i>SCN5A</i> is the only gene with definitive evidence for causality, but incomplete penetrance and polygenic effects limit its clinical utility. Important gaps remain, including the low diagnostic yield of genetic testing, the unclear course of asymptomatic BrS patients with spontaneous type I electrocardiographic pattern and in geno-negative BrS patients, and the limited validation of current risk models. In this mini review, we explore these challenges and discuss new directions, that could move the field toward more accurate and personalized management.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 12
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.