Comparison Between In-Office Versus Remote Follow-Up Costs in Patients with Pacemakers and Reimbursed Transportation in a Portuguese District Hospital

<b>Background:</b> Digital technologies can contribute to healthcare democratization in an ethical, safe, and sustainable context. The remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices enables the follow-up of patients from a distance. Patients with anti-bradycardia pacemakers represent the largest group and have the least access to this technology due to the controversial cost-benefit ratio and barriers to its widespread implementation, such as equipment costs and organizational challenges. In contrast, reimbursed transportation in Portugal reached approximately 82 million euros in 2024. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of the present study was to assess the financial viability of remote pacemaker follow-up in a Portuguese district hospital, comparing the non-urgent transportation costs and the investment in remote monitoring equipment while measuring user acceptance and satisfaction. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 41 surveys were conducted with patients who received a pacemaker and used publicly reimbursed transportation. The projected costs were calculated for two simulated protocols: the first involved in-person visits every six months, while the second involved in-person visits every two years with remote consultations every six months, over the expected lifespan of the devices. EZR, version 1.61, was used. <b>Results</b>: Our data showed a 74% overall reduction in face-to-face visits. The implementation of remote follow-up would result in a cost saving of EUR 373/patient (21.2%), with total reimbursement (<i>p</i> = 0.01151). The savings increased to 33.3%, reaching EUR 764/patient (<i>p</i> = 0.0002742) for distances greater than 60 km (round trip) for ambulance users with total reimbursement. Acceptance and satisfaction achieved 88%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Remote monitoring of pacemakers can be a financially viable alternative with high acceptance and satisfaction.