SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR TERMINAL VOLTAGE REGULATION UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD CONDITIONS USING MODEL-FREE ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND H-INFINITY CONTROLLER

This study compares the performance of the model-free adaptive control (MFAC) and H-infinity control strategies for terminal voltage control of synchronous generators under dynamic load conditions. The AVR system, incorporating a lead-lag compensator as a stabilizer, was tested under no-load, 20%, 50%, and 80% load scenarios using MATLAB/Simulink simulations. The results demonstrate that MFAC offers faster response times (0.36 s rise time at no-load) compared to the H-infinity controller (1.56 s) and exhibits significantly higher overshoot (40.14%) compared to the H-infinity controller (17.15%). The H-infinity controller provides superior stability with minimal overshoot and robust performance across all load conditions. Therefore, the H-infinity controller emerges as the optimal solution for power systems requiring precise voltage regulation under varying loads, particularly in unstable grids such as Nigeria’s.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17897825
Primary Topic
Power System Optimization and Stability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR TERMINAL VOLTAGE REGULATION UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD CONDITIONS USING MODEL-FREE ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND H-INFINITY CONTROLLER

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Power System Optimization and Stability
article

SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR TERMINAL VOLTAGE REGULATION UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD CONDITIONS USING MODEL-FREE ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND H-INFINITY CONTROLLER

article en

Abstract

This study compares the performance of the model-free adaptive control (MFAC) and H-infinity control strategies for terminal voltage control of synchronous generators under dynamic load conditions. The AVR system, incorporating a lead-lag compensator as a stabilizer, was tested under no-load, 20%, 50%, and 80% load scenarios using MATLAB/Simulink simulations. The results demonstrate that MFAC offers faster response times (0.36 s rise time at no-load) compared to the H-infinity controller (1.56 s) and exhibits significantly higher overshoot (40.14%) compared to the H-infinity controller (17.15%). The H-infinity controller provides superior stability with minimal overshoot and robust performance across all load conditions. Therefore, the H-infinity controller emerges as the optimal solution for power systems requiring precise voltage regulation under varying loads, particularly in unstable grids such as Nigeria’s.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bells University of Technology (NG), Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Power System Optimization and Stability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.