Borders, Christian Social Ethics, and the Legacy of Laudato si’

The topic of international borders intersects with the moral vision of the encyclical Laudato si’ (LS) in three ways: as challenge, as revelation of some key oversights, and as opportunity for application and refinement. As an exercise in Christian social ethics (CSE), this essay surveys these forms of intersection between international borders and the moral vision of Laudato si’ (LS) via a fourfold taxonomy for representing borders – experiential (3.1), systemic (3.2), metaphorical (3.3), and methodological (3.4) – which is ordered from concrete to abstract. On this basis, it becomes possible to pinpoint each type of borders-LS intersection at distinct levels: borders-as-challenge (levels 1 – 2), borders-as-revelation-of-oversights (levels 2 – 3), and borders-as-opportunity (levels 3 – 4). This undertaking generates strategies for engaging the moral vision of LS together with borders; it also raises promising implications for borders as integral to the methodology of CSE itself.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17879/jcsw-2025-8919
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Borders, Christian Social Ethics, and the Legacy of Laudato si’

Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Borders, Christian Social Ethics, and the Legacy of Laudato si’

article en

Abstract

The topic of international borders intersects with the moral vision of the encyclical Laudato si’ (LS) in three ways: as challenge, as revelation of some key oversights, and as opportunity for application and refinement. As an exercise in Christian social ethics (CSE), this essay surveys these forms of intersection between international borders and the moral vision of Laudato si’ (LS) via a fourfold taxonomy for representing borders – experiential (3.1), systemic (3.2), metaphorical (3.3), and methodological (3.4) – which is ordered from concrete to abstract. On this basis, it becomes possible to pinpoint each type of borders-LS intersection at distinct levels: borders-as-challenge (levels 1 – 2), borders-as-revelation-of-oversights (levels 2 – 3), and borders-as-opportunity (levels 3 – 4). This undertaking generates strategies for engaging the moral vision of LS together with borders; it also raises promising implications for borders as integral to the methodology of CSE itself.

Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.