Interaction of Soil Texture and Irrigation Level Improves Mesophyll Conductance Estimation

Combining leaf gas exchange with chlorophyll fluorescence, this study quantified the effects of soil water content (<i>SWC</i>) on mesophyll conductance (<i>g</i><sub>m</sub>) and biochemical parameters in 8-year-old pear trees across three soil textures [clay (CS), sandy (SS), loam (LS)], each subjected to three irrigation levels (100%FI, 75%FI, 50%FI). Results showed that <i>SWC</i> differed significantly, with CS > LS > SS, and that the difference in <i>SWC</i> in loam soil was the most obvious among different irrigation levels. The leaf water content (<i>LWC</i>) of SS was higher than that of LS and CS, and SS<sub>50%FI</sub> showed 7.53% and 13.30% greater <i>LWC</i> compared to LS<sub>50%FI</sub> and CS<sub>50%FI</sub>, respectively. Specific leaf area (<i>SLA</i>) peaked at CS<sub>75%FI</sub> and SS<sub>100%FI</sub>. Soil texture and irrigation level had significant interactive effects on <i>g</i><sub>m</sub>, the product of light absorption coefficient and light energy partitioning ratio (<i>α</i>·<i>β</i>), leaf apparent CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point, dark respiration rate under light, and photosynthetic biochemical parameters. Differences in the values of <i>α</i>·<i>β</i> among the nine treatments were significant and the maximum values in the three soil textures were 0.660 (LS<sub>75%FI</sub>), 0.366 (SS<sub>100%FI</sub>) and 0.462 (CS<sub>50%FI</sub>), respectively. The most sensitive treatment of <i>g</i><sub>m</sub>, responding to photosynthetically active radiation (<i>PAR</i>), was SS<sub>100%FI</sub> and the maximal <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> under saturated <i>PAR</i> reached 0.271 molCO<sub>2</sub>·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>, increasing 2.2-fold and 8.8-fold compared to that of SS<sub>75%FI</sub> and SS<sub>50%FI,</sub> respectively. An underestimation of 26.4% to an overestimation of 30.3% for <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> and an underestimation of 28.8% to an overestimation of 15.5% were observed for biochemical parameters if the empirical value (0.425) of <i>α</i>·<i>β</i> was adopted. Our findings indicated that the maximum leaf <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> could be obtained at 75%FI for loam soil, 100% FI for sandy soil, and 50% FI for clay soil, respectively.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243784
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction of Soil Texture and Irrigation Level Improves Mesophyll Conductance Estimation

Plants
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Interaction of Soil Texture and Irrigation Level Improves Mesophyll Conductance Estimation

article en

Abstract

Combining leaf gas exchange with chlorophyll fluorescence, this study quantified the effects of soil water content (<i>SWC</i>) on mesophyll conductance (<i>g</i><sub>m</sub>) and biochemical parameters in 8-year-old pear trees across three soil textures [clay (CS), sandy (SS), loam (LS)], each subjected to three irrigation levels (100%FI, 75%FI, 50%FI). Results showed that <i>SWC</i> differed significantly, with CS > LS > SS, and that the difference in <i>SWC</i> in loam soil was the most obvious among different irrigation levels. The leaf water content (<i>LWC</i>) of SS was higher than that of LS and CS, and SS<sub>50%FI</sub> showed 7.53% and 13.30% greater <i>LWC</i> compared to LS<sub>50%FI</sub> and CS<sub>50%FI</sub>, respectively. Specific leaf area (<i>SLA</i>) peaked at CS<sub>75%FI</sub> and SS<sub>100%FI</sub>. Soil texture and irrigation level had significant interactive effects on <i>g</i><sub>m</sub>, the product of light absorption coefficient and light energy partitioning ratio (<i>α</i>·<i>β</i>), leaf apparent CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point, dark respiration rate under light, and photosynthetic biochemical parameters. Differences in the values of <i>α</i>·<i>β</i> among the nine treatments were significant and the maximum values in the three soil textures were 0.660 (LS<sub>75%FI</sub>), 0.366 (SS<sub>100%FI</sub>) and 0.462 (CS<sub>50%FI</sub>), respectively. The most sensitive treatment of <i>g</i><sub>m</sub>, responding to photosynthetically active radiation (<i>PAR</i>), was SS<sub>100%FI</sub> and the maximal <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> under saturated <i>PAR</i> reached 0.271 molCO<sub>2</sub>·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>, increasing 2.2-fold and 8.8-fold compared to that of SS<sub>75%FI</sub> and SS<sub>50%FI,</sub> respectively. An underestimation of 26.4% to an overestimation of 30.3% for <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> and an underestimation of 28.8% to an overestimation of 15.5% were observed for biochemical parameters if the empirical value (0.425) of <i>α</i>·<i>β</i> was adopted. Our findings indicated that the maximum leaf <i>g</i><sub>m</sub> could be obtained at 75%FI for loam soil, 100% FI for sandy soil, and 50% FI for clay soil, respectively.

PlantsVol. 14(24)
Shanxi Agricultural University (CN), Institute of Pomology (CN), Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.