Mapping the Field of Effective Teaching and Interventions for Children With Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Tertiary Review, Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis, and National Survey

ABSTRACT This paper maps the field of teaching and interventions for children with reading difficulties through a systematic tertiary review, qualitative meta‐synthesis, and a national survey. The study has two main aims: (1) to provide an up‐to‐date review of systematic reviews and longitudinal experimental trials of effective interventions for children with reading difficulties; and (2) to report the findings from a national survey that addressed approaches to teaching children with reading difficulties in England. The synthesis of systematic reviews and longitudinal trials indicates that multicomponent interventions show promise in improving outcomes for children with reading difficulties. Reflections are offered on specific components with evidence of effectiveness, which may inform the design of future multicomponent trials. A main finding from the national survey responses was that even if the synthetic phonics approach was not working, some teachers and teaching assistants continued with the approach. Other teachers adopted different approaches including multiple‐component interventions. Some survey respondents perceived that England's policy on synthetic phonics was resulting in tensions with the aim of motivating children to read. It is argued that reading motivation, and the nature of texts used in instruction, require greater attention as components of effective interventions. The paper concludes with some recommendations for components to be included in new interventions, some future directions for research, and reflections on curriculum policies for the teaching of reading.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70075
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Field of Effective Teaching and Interventions for Children With Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Tertiary Review, Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis, and National Survey

1 citations
Reading Research Quarterly
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

Mapping the Field of Effective Teaching and Interventions for Children With Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Tertiary Review, Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis, and National Survey

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper maps the field of teaching and interventions for children with reading difficulties through a systematic tertiary review, qualitative meta‐synthesis, and a national survey. The study has two main aims: (1) to provide an up‐to‐date review of systematic reviews and longitudinal experimental trials of effective interventions for children with reading difficulties; and (2) to report the findings from a national survey that addressed approaches to teaching children with reading difficulties in England. The synthesis of systematic reviews and longitudinal trials indicates that multicomponent interventions show promise in improving outcomes for children with reading difficulties. Reflections are offered on specific components with evidence of effectiveness, which may inform the design of future multicomponent trials. A main finding from the national survey responses was that even if the synthetic phonics approach was not working, some teachers and teaching assistants continued with the approach. Other teachers adopted different approaches including multiple‐component interventions. Some survey respondents perceived that England's policy on synthetic phonics was resulting in tensions with the aim of motivating children to read. It is argued that reading motivation, and the nature of texts used in instruction, require greater attention as components of effective interventions. The paper concludes with some recommendations for components to be included in new interventions, some future directions for research, and reflections on curriculum policies for the teaching of reading.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 61(1)
Institute of Physics (GB), University College London (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping the Field of Effective Teaching and Interventions for Children With Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Tertiary Review, Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis, and National Survey · Reading Research Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS