Taking the power back: conceptualizing a people-centred energy transition

• The global hegemonic energy transition discourse is framed as politically neutral. • The energy transition discourse obscures and reproduces global inequalities. • Governmentality research balances post-colonial critique and agency of the “weak”. • Governmentality allows for transformative and policy-relevant research. • Governmentality’s decentred power unlocks individuals’ transformative potential. This paper critically examines the dominant discourse of the global energy transition from fossil fuel-based energy to low-carbon sources and reveals its underpinning in a liberal cosmopolitan-informed biopolitical logic. This discourse achieved hegemony by instrumentalizing climate change science, making it appear politically neutral and ecologically imperative. This research reveals three key limitations of this hegemonic discourse, namely depoliticization, Westen-centrism, and obfuscation of unequal power relations. These limitations compound to shield the hegemonic energy transition discourse from political and intellectual scrutiny, which in turn risks perpetuating colonial and racialized global hierarchies characteristic of the fossil fuel-based energy system. This paper joins the literature which seeks to highlight how power is embedded in energy discourses and practices. This paper advances a conceptual contribution to this literature through proposing the use of Foucauldian governmentality. This research demonstrates that governmentality is better equipped than post-colonialist perspectives to simultaneously historicise and contextualise unequal power relations to account for contingency, resistance, and agency. This paper therefore advocates for the operationalization of governmentality to account for post-colonial structures without jettisoning an awareness of the role of individual agency in reshaping energy systems and subverting attendant power relations. By doing so, governmentality-minded investigations can transcend interest-based perspectives to enable policy-relevant findings with the potential to transform the status quo

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Climate Change
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100230
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking the power back: conceptualizing a people-centred energy transition

Energy and Climate Change
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Taking the power back: conceptualizing a people-centred energy transition

article en

Abstract

• The global hegemonic energy transition discourse is framed as politically neutral. • The energy transition discourse obscures and reproduces global inequalities. • Governmentality research balances post-colonial critique and agency of the “weak”. • Governmentality allows for transformative and policy-relevant research. • Governmentality’s decentred power unlocks individuals’ transformative potential. This paper critically examines the dominant discourse of the global energy transition from fossil fuel-based energy to low-carbon sources and reveals its underpinning in a liberal cosmopolitan-informed biopolitical logic. This discourse achieved hegemony by instrumentalizing climate change science, making it appear politically neutral and ecologically imperative. This research reveals three key limitations of this hegemonic discourse, namely depoliticization, Westen-centrism, and obfuscation of unequal power relations. These limitations compound to shield the hegemonic energy transition discourse from political and intellectual scrutiny, which in turn risks perpetuating colonial and racialized global hierarchies characteristic of the fossil fuel-based energy system. This paper joins the literature which seeks to highlight how power is embedded in energy discourses and practices. This paper advances a conceptual contribution to this literature through proposing the use of Foucauldian governmentality. This research demonstrates that governmentality is better equipped than post-colonialist perspectives to simultaneously historicise and contextualise unequal power relations to account for contingency, resistance, and agency. This paper therefore advocates for the operationalization of governmentality to account for post-colonial structures without jettisoning an awareness of the role of individual agency in reshaping energy systems and subverting attendant power relations. By doing so, governmentality-minded investigations can transcend interest-based perspectives to enable policy-relevant findings with the potential to transform the status quo

Energy and Climate ChangeVol. 7
Tunisian Union of Agriculture and Fisheries (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.