S3198 PP-Why? Evaluation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing Practices in a Primary Care Clinic

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended for short‐term management of acid‐mediated upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions but are often continued for poorly defined indications. Long-term PPI use has been linked to enteric infections, chronic kidney disease, fractures, and dementia. One ambulatory care center estimated inappropriate PPI prescribing costs at $1.5 million annually, and up to two-thirds of users lack a clear indication. National guidelines now advocate structured deprescribing for patients without definitive long-term indications. To address this issue locally, we sought to evaluate PPI prescribing practices in the New York Presbyterian Queens (NYPQ) primary care clinic, identify patients eligible for deprescribing, and uncover opportunities for future research, patient care, and education. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional review of electronic medical records of adult patients (≥18 years) prescribed a PPI for ≥30 days and seen October-December 2024 in the NYPQ primary care clinic. Deceased and palliative/hospice patients were excluded. Pharmacy and resident teams extracted demographics, PPI indication, and duration. Long-term use was deemed appropriate for Barrett’s esophagus, Los Angeles grade C/D esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease–related strictures, high ulcer-bleeding risk on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or recurrent ulcer bleeding prophylaxis. Indications such as refractory functional dyspepsia, steroid use without NSAIDs, non-ulcer bleeding, and isolated lower GI symptoms were classified as inappropriate. Patients were grouped as eligible for deprescribing, ineligible, or requiring further review. Results: Of 199 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 21 (10.5%) had discontinued PPIs. Among the remaining 178, 47% were eligible for deprescribing, 44% required further review, and 9% were ineligible. Conclusion: Nearly half of long-term PPI users in our clinic met deprescribing criteria, mirroring findings from similar ambulatory care center studies nationwide. Given the risks of adverse effects, polypharmacy, and economic burden, interprofessional deprescribing initiatives are warranted. We will pilot a clinic-wide protocol involving patient education, rebound monitoring, and lifestyle support to optimize therapy and enhance patient safety.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001140252.48121.0d
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3198 PP-Why? Evaluation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing Practices in a Primary Care Clinic

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S3198 PP-Why? Evaluation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing Practices in a Primary Care Clinic

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended for short‐term management of acid‐mediated upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions but are often continued for poorly defined indications. Long-term PPI use has been linked to enteric infections, chronic kidney disease, fractures, and dementia. One ambulatory care center estimated inappropriate PPI prescribing costs at $1.5 million annually, and up to two-thirds of users lack a clear indication. National guidelines now advocate structured deprescribing for patients without definitive long-term indications. To address this issue locally, we sought to evaluate PPI prescribing practices in the New York Presbyterian Queens (NYPQ) primary care clinic, identify patients eligible for deprescribing, and uncover opportunities for future research, patient care, and education. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional review of electronic medical records of adult patients (≥18 years) prescribed a PPI for ≥30 days and seen October-December 2024 in the NYPQ primary care clinic. Deceased and palliative/hospice patients were excluded. Pharmacy and resident teams extracted demographics, PPI indication, and duration. Long-term use was deemed appropriate for Barrett’s esophagus, Los Angeles grade C/D esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease–related strictures, high ulcer-bleeding risk on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or recurrent ulcer bleeding prophylaxis. Indications such as refractory functional dyspepsia, steroid use without NSAIDs, non-ulcer bleeding, and isolated lower GI symptoms were classified as inappropriate. Patients were grouped as eligible for deprescribing, ineligible, or requiring further review. Results: Of 199 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 21 (10.5%) had discontinued PPIs. Among the remaining 178, 47% were eligible for deprescribing, 44% required further review, and 9% were ineligible. Conclusion: Nearly half of long-term PPI users in our clinic met deprescribing criteria, mirroring findings from similar ambulatory care center studies nationwide. Given the risks of adverse effects, polypharmacy, and economic burden, interprofessional deprescribing initiatives are warranted. We will pilot a clinic-wide protocol involving patient education, rebound monitoring, and lifestyle support to optimize therapy and enhance patient safety.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.