S3101 Fundic Gland Polyp Outcomes in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Introduction: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline adenomatous polyposis coli mutations. Second to colorectal cancer, duodenal cancer (DC) is the leading cause of death, prompting upper endoscopic surveillance. However, fundic gland polyps (FGPs) have poorly defined malignant potential with reported gastric cancer (GC) risk of 2%-4%. Evidence-based strategies for surveillance of upper GI malignancies in FAP are lacking. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of FAP patients undergoing endoscopic fundic gland polypectomy surveillance (2001-2025). Endoscopic progression was defined as increases in polyp size/number/distribution; histologic progression as advancement from normal to dysplasia/carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate 10-year cumulative incidence. Associations were assessed using generalized linear regression models. Results: Fifty-one FAP patients (mean age 52.6 ± 16.7 years, 45.1% female, 92.2% White) were followed for median 84.6 months. 6 (11.8%) developed GC at mean age 52.5 ± 14.5 years. No DC occurred despite 66.7% having duodenal/ampullary polyps (11 patients with Spiegelman Score III/IV). Mean age at first dysplasia detection was 44 ± 14.8 years. Overall, 52.9% had low-grade dysplasia, while 3.9% had high-grade dysplasia. Of 25 patients without initial dysplasia, 16 progressed histologically. GC development followed dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in 4 patients. Among patients with serial FGP biopsies, 43.1% had histologic progression with 10-year cumulative incidence 53.4% (95% CI 31.7-68.1). In GC patients, 83.3% had preceding FGP dysplasia, while 33.3% had pyloric gland adenomas. Polyp size ≥1 cm was strongly associated with cancer (P < 0.01). Endoscopic progression was less common (19.6%), with 10-year cumulative incidence 33.9% (95% CI 13-49.9). However, only endoscopic progression was significantly associated with GC (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Contrary to conventional belief, GC occurred at surprisingly high risk in our cohort. Despite 66.7% having duodenal polyps (11 with a high Spiegelman score), we encountered no DC, possibly attributable to effective snare polypectomy. Our findings support endoscopic FGP surveillance starting at age 45 and therapeutic removal of FGP ≥1 cm. However, large collaborative studies are needed to establish evidence-based prevention strategies for this high-risk population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139864.82877.2b
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3101 Fundic Gland Polyp Outcomes in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

S3101 Fundic Gland Polyp Outcomes in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline adenomatous polyposis coli mutations. Second to colorectal cancer, duodenal cancer (DC) is the leading cause of death, prompting upper endoscopic surveillance. However, fundic gland polyps (FGPs) have poorly defined malignant potential with reported gastric cancer (GC) risk of 2%-4%. Evidence-based strategies for surveillance of upper GI malignancies in FAP are lacking. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of FAP patients undergoing endoscopic fundic gland polypectomy surveillance (2001-2025). Endoscopic progression was defined as increases in polyp size/number/distribution; histologic progression as advancement from normal to dysplasia/carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate 10-year cumulative incidence. Associations were assessed using generalized linear regression models. Results: Fifty-one FAP patients (mean age 52.6 ± 16.7 years, 45.1% female, 92.2% White) were followed for median 84.6 months. 6 (11.8%) developed GC at mean age 52.5 ± 14.5 years. No DC occurred despite 66.7% having duodenal/ampullary polyps (11 patients with Spiegelman Score III/IV). Mean age at first dysplasia detection was 44 ± 14.8 years. Overall, 52.9% had low-grade dysplasia, while 3.9% had high-grade dysplasia. Of 25 patients without initial dysplasia, 16 progressed histologically. GC development followed dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in 4 patients. Among patients with serial FGP biopsies, 43.1% had histologic progression with 10-year cumulative incidence 53.4% (95% CI 31.7-68.1). In GC patients, 83.3% had preceding FGP dysplasia, while 33.3% had pyloric gland adenomas. Polyp size ≥1 cm was strongly associated with cancer (P < 0.01). Endoscopic progression was less common (19.6%), with 10-year cumulative incidence 33.9% (95% CI 13-49.9). However, only endoscopic progression was significantly associated with GC (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Contrary to conventional belief, GC occurred at surprisingly high risk in our cohort. Despite 66.7% having duodenal polyps (11 with a high Spiegelman score), we encountered no DC, possibly attributable to effective snare polypectomy. Our findings support endoscopic FGP surveillance starting at age 45 and therapeutic removal of FGP ≥1 cm. However, large collaborative studies are needed to establish evidence-based prevention strategies for this high-risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.