The Methodology of "Boolean OR" (T1 or T2) Contrasted with "Versus" (T1 versus T2)

It is extremely common for scholars to engage in what might be called “theory combats,” which this paper generically refers to as the “versus” research goal. This involves pitting one theory, T1, against another one, T2. For example, for years—if not decades—in international relations scholars have pitted realism against rational choice—institutionalism versus social constructivism. If the study was statistical, then there would be variables representing each theory in the statistical model. Ideally, the author’s preferred theory, T1 hereafter, is statistically significant, while the competing theories (T2) were not. It is also common for two or even all three of the variables representing these theories to be statistically significant.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17671883
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Methodology of "Boolean OR" (T1 or T2) Contrasted with "Versus" (T1 versus T2)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

The Methodology of "Boolean OR" (T1 or T2) Contrasted with "Versus" (T1 versus T2)

article en

Abstract

It is extremely common for scholars to engage in what might be called “theory combats,” which this paper generically refers to as the “versus” research goal. This involves pitting one theory, T1, against another one, T2. For example, for years—if not decades—in international relations scholars have pitted realism against rational choice—institutionalism versus social constructivism. If the study was statistical, then there would be variables representing each theory in the statistical model. Ideally, the author’s preferred theory, T1 hereafter, is statistically significant, while the competing theories (T2) were not. It is also common for two or even all three of the variables representing these theories to be statistically significant.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Notre Dame (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Methodology of "Boolean OR" (T1 or T2) Contrasted with "Versus" (T1 versus T2) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS