Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite the recognized need for early interventions to prevent maltreatment and family separation in families involved with child protection services (CPS), evidence for children aged 0 to 5 years remains scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to these families in reducing the risk of harm, improving parenting quality, and supporting parental functioning. The review included families with children aged 0 to 5 years engaged with CPS and deemed at risk of entering the care system. A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Meta-analyses used random effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). Narrative synthesis was provided for outcomes not appropriate to include in meta-analyses. Fifteen RCTs (n = 2,232 families) were included. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent effects on reducing subsequent maltreatment, as measured by official records (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.75, 1.02]) or parent-reported risk of harm (SMD = -0.07, [-0.25, 0.11]). However, significant improvements were observed in parental sensitivity (SMD = 0.53, [0.30, 0.76]), attachment organization (OR = 2.17, [1.64, 2.87]), and parental functioning (SMD = -0.21, [-0.36, -0.06]). In conclusion, psychosocial interventions show promise in improving parenting among edge-of-care families but lack consistent evidence for reducing maltreatment risk. Future research should prioritize larger trials with standardized outcome measures to strengthen this evidence base.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.123830
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

article en

Abstract

Despite the recognized need for early interventions to prevent maltreatment and family separation in families involved with child protection services (CPS), evidence for children aged 0 to 5 years remains scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to these families in reducing the risk of harm, improving parenting quality, and supporting parental functioning. The review included families with children aged 0 to 5 years engaged with CPS and deemed at risk of entering the care system. A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Meta-analyses used random effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). Narrative synthesis was provided for outcomes not appropriate to include in meta-analyses. Fifteen RCTs (n = 2,232 families) were included. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent effects on reducing subsequent maltreatment, as measured by official records (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.75, 1.02]) or parent-reported risk of harm (SMD = -0.07, [-0.25, 0.11]). However, significant improvements were observed in parental sensitivity (SMD = 0.53, [0.30, 0.76]), attachment organization (OR = 2.17, [1.64, 2.87]), and parental functioning (SMD = -0.21, [-0.36, -0.06]). In conclusion, psychosocial interventions show promise in improving parenting among edge-of-care families but lack consistent evidence for reducing maltreatment risk. Future research should prioritize larger trials with standardized outcome measures to strengthen this evidence base.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS