S3108 The MAFLD Paradox: Lower Risk of Marginal Ulcers but Elevated Mortality After Gastric Bypass

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a common bariatric procedure, offering significant benefits for weight loss and metabolic function among patients with obesity. However, the presence of comorbid diseases such as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) may significantly alter the post-operative outcomes given the systematic inflammation and metabolic derangements associated with this condition. Marginal ulcers are a known complication following RYGB with an incidence that can reach up to 36%. Although several studies have assessed complications among RYGB patients, none of them specifically deal with how MAFLD affects mortality and the risk of marginal ulcers post-surgery, making this a relatively unexplored area. These are critical parameters, as they greatly impact recovery, quality of life, and health in the long term. This study aims to compare the incidence of marginal ulcers in patients with and without MAFLD undergoing RYGB. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to evaluate outcomes in adult patients who underwent RYGB. First cohort consisted of patients with MAFLD (n = 13,165) and those without MAFLD (n = 29,448). Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics and comorbidities resulting in 12,435 patients in each cohort after matching. The outcomes evaluated within 1 year following surgery were marginal ulcers and mortality. Statistical analyses included risk comparisons, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and hazard ratios, with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: The incidence of marginal ulcers was significantly lower in patients with MAFLD compared to those without MAFLD (3.9% vs 4.9%; odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.89; P ≤ 0.001). Mortality was higher in the MAFLD cohort (0.6%) compared to the non-MAFLD cohort (0.4%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.95-1.94; P = 0.088). These findings highlight that MAFLD may influence post-gastric bypass outcomes, offering potential protection against marginal ulcers but with a trend toward increased mortality. Conclusion: MAFLD was associated with a significantly lower risk of marginal ulcers following RYGB, suggesting a potential protective effect. However, a trend toward increased mortality in the MAFLD cohort, though not statistically significant, highlights the need for further research to understand the underlying mechanisms and optimize perioperative management in this population.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139892.60730.2e
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3108 The MAFLD Paradox: Lower Risk of Marginal Ulcers but Elevated Mortality After Gastric Bypass

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S3108 The MAFLD Paradox: Lower Risk of Marginal Ulcers but Elevated Mortality After Gastric Bypass

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a common bariatric procedure, offering significant benefits for weight loss and metabolic function among patients with obesity. However, the presence of comorbid diseases such as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) may significantly alter the post-operative outcomes given the systematic inflammation and metabolic derangements associated with this condition. Marginal ulcers are a known complication following RYGB with an incidence that can reach up to 36%. Although several studies have assessed complications among RYGB patients, none of them specifically deal with how MAFLD affects mortality and the risk of marginal ulcers post-surgery, making this a relatively unexplored area. These are critical parameters, as they greatly impact recovery, quality of life, and health in the long term. This study aims to compare the incidence of marginal ulcers in patients with and without MAFLD undergoing RYGB. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to evaluate outcomes in adult patients who underwent RYGB. First cohort consisted of patients with MAFLD (n = 13,165) and those without MAFLD (n = 29,448). Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics and comorbidities resulting in 12,435 patients in each cohort after matching. The outcomes evaluated within 1 year following surgery were marginal ulcers and mortality. Statistical analyses included risk comparisons, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and hazard ratios, with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: The incidence of marginal ulcers was significantly lower in patients with MAFLD compared to those without MAFLD (3.9% vs 4.9%; odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.89; P ≤ 0.001). Mortality was higher in the MAFLD cohort (0.6%) compared to the non-MAFLD cohort (0.4%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.95-1.94; P = 0.088). These findings highlight that MAFLD may influence post-gastric bypass outcomes, offering potential protection against marginal ulcers but with a trend toward increased mortality. Conclusion: MAFLD was associated with a significantly lower risk of marginal ulcers following RYGB, suggesting a potential protective effect. However, a trend toward increased mortality in the MAFLD cohort, though not statistically significant, highlights the need for further research to understand the underlying mechanisms and optimize perioperative management in this population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.