Pain beliefs, treatment expectations, and treatment experiences in spinal pain – a scoping review of qualitative studies

Objectives: To provide a comprehensive overview of qualitative studies on three key perspectives of patients with nonspecific back and neck pain – pain beliefs, treatment expectations, treatment experiences, and their interaction. Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL and included articles from inception to 1 October 2025. Two reviewers screened the records for eligibility in a two-step process. Data were charted and synthesized narratively. Results: Twenty-four studies involving a total of 666 participants were included. Most patients held biomedical pain beliefs and sought a specific diagnosis for their condition. Such a diagnosis influenced treatment expectations, which were in turn linked to previous treatment experiences. A need for pain validation, often expected to be confirmed through diagnostic imaging, emerged as an overarching theme. This need can be addressed by the health professionals’ empathy and genuine interest in participatory engagement, their perceived competence, e.g. reflected by a thorough physical examination, and their guidance toward patient self-management considering individual barriers. Conclusions: Patients’ beliefs, expectations, and experiences were connected by an underlying need for validation of their pain experience. Incorporating empathetic, individually tailored pain validation, distinct from solicitousness and mere reassurance, into spinal management might improve treatment satisfaction and outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280678
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain beliefs, treatment expectations, and treatment experiences in spinal pain – a scoping review of qualitative studies

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Pain beliefs, treatment expectations, and treatment experiences in spinal pain – a scoping review of qualitative studies

article en

Abstract

Objectives: To provide a comprehensive overview of qualitative studies on three key perspectives of patients with nonspecific back and neck pain – pain beliefs, treatment expectations, treatment experiences, and their interaction. Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL and included articles from inception to 1 October 2025. Two reviewers screened the records for eligibility in a two-step process. Data were charted and synthesized narratively. Results: Twenty-four studies involving a total of 666 participants were included. Most patients held biomedical pain beliefs and sought a specific diagnosis for their condition. Such a diagnosis influenced treatment expectations, which were in turn linked to previous treatment experiences. A need for pain validation, often expected to be confirmed through diagnostic imaging, emerged as an overarching theme. This need can be addressed by the health professionals’ empathy and genuine interest in participatory engagement, their perceived competence, e.g. reflected by a thorough physical examination, and their guidance toward patient self-management considering individual barriers. Conclusions: Patients’ beliefs, expectations, and experiences were connected by an underlying need for validation of their pain experience. Incorporating empathetic, individually tailored pain validation, distinct from solicitousness and mere reassurance, into spinal management might improve treatment satisfaction and outcomes.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.