Trust Performance Indicators and Trust Stress Tests: A Conceptual Proposition for Trustworthy Health Data Spaces

The development of trustworthy Health Data Spaces (HDS) is currently in the spotlight of digital health policy. Diverse stakeholders agree on the importance of trust for the adoption and legitimacy of HDS. This emphasis on trust has led to the development of conceptual work describing what trust in HDS entails, along with initial suggestions on how trust principles can be operationalized in HDS governance and architecture. In contrast, little research has been conducted on methods to evaluate the performance of trust-building principles and the overall trustworthiness of HDS. In response, we propose two distinct methodologies that share a common focus on assessing trustworthiness: A) Trust Performance Indicators collect routine data related to trust-building principles. B) Trust Stress Tests support the design of resilient HDS architectures by identifying potential future scenarios that could undermine their trustworthiness. Through these methodologies, we aim to contribute to the ongoing development of trustworthy HDS.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-281010
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust Performance Indicators and Trust Stress Tests: A Conceptual Proposition for Trustworthy Health Data Spaces

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Trust Performance Indicators and Trust Stress Tests: A Conceptual Proposition for Trustworthy Health Data Spaces

article en

Abstract

The development of trustworthy Health Data Spaces (HDS) is currently in the spotlight of digital health policy. Diverse stakeholders agree on the importance of trust for the adoption and legitimacy of HDS. This emphasis on trust has led to the development of conceptual work describing what trust in HDS entails, along with initial suggestions on how trust principles can be operationalized in HDS governance and architecture. In contrast, little research has been conducted on methods to evaluate the performance of trust-building principles and the overall trustworthiness of HDS. In response, we propose two distinct methodologies that share a common focus on assessing trustworthiness: A) Trust Performance Indicators collect routine data related to trust-building principles. B) Trust Stress Tests support the design of resilient HDS architectures by identifying potential future scenarios that could undermine their trustworthiness. Through these methodologies, we aim to contribute to the ongoing development of trustworthy HDS.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.