S2424 The Impact of MELD 3.0 Score Severity in Cirrhotic Patients on Cardiac Structure and Function Based on ECG and Echocardiogram Analysis

Introduction: Liver cirrhosis is recognized as a contributor to cardiovascular dysfunction, including impaired cardiac function and conduction abnormalities. While ECG findings such as QRS voltage attenuation are commonly reported, their relationship to liver disease severity is unclear. Prior studies suggest that ECG parameters in cirrhotic patients may be affected by fluid distribution. This study examines the association between the MELD 3.0 score and both cardiac dysfunction and ECG abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. Methods: We analyzed 156 cirrhotic patients with available ECGs. MELD 3.0 scores, calculated using labs within 2 weeks of ECG acquisition, categorized into 3 groups (<10, 10–19, ≥20). QRS voltages and intervals (PR, QTc) were manually measured using EP Calipers. One-way ANOVA was used to compare ECG and cardiac functional parameters, such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, across MELD groups. We used correlational and multiple linear regression analyses to assess the relationship between MELD 3.0 scores and QRS voltages in limb and precordial leads. These analyses also evaluated the independent effects of fluid distribution, specifically peripheral edema and ascites, on voltage changes. Results: Cryptogenic cirrhosis was the most etiology. Higher MELD 3.0 scores were associated with lower LV ejection fraction (P = 0.018), a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.013), T-wave abnormalities (P = 0.033), and LV hypertrophy (P = 0.037). QRS amplitude in lead aVR declined with increasing MELD 3.0 severity (P = 0.05). While QRS voltages in precordial and limb leads showed weak negative correlations with MELD 3.0, these were not statistically significant. Adjusting for ascites modestly improved the correlation in limb leads (P = 0.035), but no clear trends emerged across lead types or fluid distribution patterns. Conclusion: Higher MELD 3.0 scores were significantly associated with both structural (LV dysfunction, hypertrophy) and electrophysiological (arrhythmias, repolarization abnormalities) cardiac changes. These findings align with prior studies suggesting that worsening liver disease, as measured by earlier versions of the MELD and Child-Pugh scores, contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Although QRS voltage attenuation was observed, it showed a weak negative correlation with MELD 3.0 and appeared unaffected by fluid distribution. This suggests that intrinsic myocardial dysfunction, rather than fluid-related factors, may underlie the ECG abnormalities in advanced cirrhosis.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001137156.51822.02
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2424 The Impact of MELD 3.0 Score Severity in Cirrhotic Patients on Cardiac Structure and Function Based on ECG and Echocardiogram Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2424 The Impact of MELD 3.0 Score Severity in Cirrhotic Patients on Cardiac Structure and Function Based on ECG and Echocardiogram Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Liver cirrhosis is recognized as a contributor to cardiovascular dysfunction, including impaired cardiac function and conduction abnormalities. While ECG findings such as QRS voltage attenuation are commonly reported, their relationship to liver disease severity is unclear. Prior studies suggest that ECG parameters in cirrhotic patients may be affected by fluid distribution. This study examines the association between the MELD 3.0 score and both cardiac dysfunction and ECG abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. Methods: We analyzed 156 cirrhotic patients with available ECGs. MELD 3.0 scores, calculated using labs within 2 weeks of ECG acquisition, categorized into 3 groups (<10, 10–19, ≥20). QRS voltages and intervals (PR, QTc) were manually measured using EP Calipers. One-way ANOVA was used to compare ECG and cardiac functional parameters, such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, across MELD groups. We used correlational and multiple linear regression analyses to assess the relationship between MELD 3.0 scores and QRS voltages in limb and precordial leads. These analyses also evaluated the independent effects of fluid distribution, specifically peripheral edema and ascites, on voltage changes. Results: Cryptogenic cirrhosis was the most etiology. Higher MELD 3.0 scores were associated with lower LV ejection fraction (P = 0.018), a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.013), T-wave abnormalities (P = 0.033), and LV hypertrophy (P = 0.037). QRS amplitude in lead aVR declined with increasing MELD 3.0 severity (P = 0.05). While QRS voltages in precordial and limb leads showed weak negative correlations with MELD 3.0, these were not statistically significant. Adjusting for ascites modestly improved the correlation in limb leads (P = 0.035), but no clear trends emerged across lead types or fluid distribution patterns. Conclusion: Higher MELD 3.0 scores were significantly associated with both structural (LV dysfunction, hypertrophy) and electrophysiological (arrhythmias, repolarization abnormalities) cardiac changes. These findings align with prior studies suggesting that worsening liver disease, as measured by earlier versions of the MELD and Child-Pugh scores, contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Although QRS voltage attenuation was observed, it showed a weak negative correlation with MELD 3.0 and appeared unaffected by fluid distribution. This suggests that intrinsic myocardial dysfunction, rather than fluid-related factors, may underlie the ECG abnormalities in advanced cirrhosis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.