S2953 Improving First Case On-Time Starts: A Quality Improvement Initiative in a Tertiary Care Hospital Based Endoscopy Unit

Introduction: First case on-time start (FCOTS) is an important metric in procedural efficiency, resource utilization, and patient satisfaction in endoscopy units. Delays in FCOTS can lead to procedural backlogs, increased staff overtime, and reduced patient flow. Tertiary care centers that offer both general and advanced interventional endoscopy face unique operational challenges due to case complexity and multidisciplinary coordination. We identify barriers to FCOTS and implement interventions to improve start-time reliability. Methods: This quality improvement (QI) study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital performing general and interventional advanced inpatient and outpatient endoscopy procedures. A multidisciplinary team consisting of gastroenterologists, anesthesiologists, and nursing staff was created with the goal of improving FCOTS. Baseline FCOTS data were collected from January 2024 to December 2024 using electronic medical record procedural logs. Beginning December 2024, interventions that took place included an initial communication of this QI project’s goals and expectations for procedural unit nursing staff in all phases of care, anesthesia providers, and gastroenterologists. Distribution of a feedback collaboration tool, adjustment of staff start times to support FCOTS, weekly newsletters reporting FCOTS data, and meetings with providers to review their performance occurred. Barriers to timely starts were recorded. FCOTS rate was measured after the interventions took place over a 6-month period. We used an independent t-test to compare FCOTS rates before and after interventions. Results: The FCOTS rate increased from 52.5% to 68.8% post QI implementation (P = 0.0041). The average pre-operative phase to in procedure room time decreased by 13 min pre to post FCOTS QI implementation (94.6 min vs 81.5 min, P = 0.0093). Delays in FCOTS included late arrival by anesthesia (14.3%), incomplete consent (7.1%), incomplete history and physical examination (7.1%), late arrival by proceduralist (7.1%), and non-provider causes (46.4%) including delays in room set-up, technical issues, incomplete room preparation, and late patient arrival. Conclusion: Implementation of a multidisciplinary QI initiative led to improved FCOTS rate in a tertiary care endoscopy center. Common barriers included provider and non-provider causes offering targeted interventions. These findings emphasize the importance of a collaborative, system-level approach to improve procedural efficiency.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139272.44607.76
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2953 Improving First Case On-Time Starts: A Quality Improvement Initiative in a Tertiary Care Hospital Based Endoscopy Unit

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

S2953 Improving First Case On-Time Starts: A Quality Improvement Initiative in a Tertiary Care Hospital Based Endoscopy Unit

article en

Abstract

Introduction: First case on-time start (FCOTS) is an important metric in procedural efficiency, resource utilization, and patient satisfaction in endoscopy units. Delays in FCOTS can lead to procedural backlogs, increased staff overtime, and reduced patient flow. Tertiary care centers that offer both general and advanced interventional endoscopy face unique operational challenges due to case complexity and multidisciplinary coordination. We identify barriers to FCOTS and implement interventions to improve start-time reliability. Methods: This quality improvement (QI) study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital performing general and interventional advanced inpatient and outpatient endoscopy procedures. A multidisciplinary team consisting of gastroenterologists, anesthesiologists, and nursing staff was created with the goal of improving FCOTS. Baseline FCOTS data were collected from January 2024 to December 2024 using electronic medical record procedural logs. Beginning December 2024, interventions that took place included an initial communication of this QI project’s goals and expectations for procedural unit nursing staff in all phases of care, anesthesia providers, and gastroenterologists. Distribution of a feedback collaboration tool, adjustment of staff start times to support FCOTS, weekly newsletters reporting FCOTS data, and meetings with providers to review their performance occurred. Barriers to timely starts were recorded. FCOTS rate was measured after the interventions took place over a 6-month period. We used an independent t-test to compare FCOTS rates before and after interventions. Results: The FCOTS rate increased from 52.5% to 68.8% post QI implementation (P = 0.0041). The average pre-operative phase to in procedure room time decreased by 13 min pre to post FCOTS QI implementation (94.6 min vs 81.5 min, P = 0.0093). Delays in FCOTS included late arrival by anesthesia (14.3%), incomplete consent (7.1%), incomplete history and physical examination (7.1%), late arrival by proceduralist (7.1%), and non-provider causes (46.4%) including delays in room set-up, technical issues, incomplete room preparation, and late patient arrival. Conclusion: Implementation of a multidisciplinary QI initiative led to improved FCOTS rate in a tertiary care endoscopy center. Common barriers included provider and non-provider causes offering targeted interventions. These findings emphasize the importance of a collaborative, system-level approach to improve procedural efficiency.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.