S3115 Prevalence and Incidence of Gastroparesis Following Lung or Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Gastroparesis (GP) is a recognized complication following solid organ transplantation that may impact nutritional status, medication absorption, and overall outcomes. We aimed to quantify the pooled prevalence and incidence of GP, specifically after lung and heart transplantation. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2025 for studies reporting the prevalence or incidence of GP following lung or heart transplantation. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Using R statistical software, we conducted random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (Cis), stratified by transplant type. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. We conducted leave-one-out analysis, influence diagnostics, and examined publication bias using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Meta-regression explored the impact of age and sex. Results: Of the 1,255 initially identified studies, 25 studies with a total of 2,982 patients met the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening. Women constituted 1,308 (44.57%) of the total participants. The mean age was 45.8 ± 11.74. The overall prevalence of GP was 31.07% (95% CI 20.71-43.75%; I2 = 95.1%; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher prevalence of GP in combined lung and heart transplant recipients (40.22%; 95% CI 18.05-67.27%) compared to lung transplant only (27.29%; 95% CI 16.74-41.19%), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.3711). The overall incidence was 27.18% (95% CI 17.33-39.93%; I2 = 92.2%; P < 0.0001), with combined transplant recipients showing higher incidence (37.18%; 95% CI 23.21-53.69%) than lung transplant only (21.13%; 95% CI 10.59-37.73%; P = 0.1418). Sensitivity analyses through leave-one-out and influential case removal could not fully resolve the considerable heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between GP prevalence or incidence and patient age or sex. Egger's regression test indicated no significant publication bias for prevalence (P = 0.6698) or incidence (P = 0.4601) outcomes. Conclusion: This analysis highlighted the high prevalence of GP following lung or heart transplantation, occurring in approximately 31% of patients overall. Thus, standardized GP screening protocols before and after transplantation might be warranted.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139920.59227.2c
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3115 Prevalence and Incidence of Gastroparesis Following Lung or Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

S3115 Prevalence and Incidence of Gastroparesis Following Lung or Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroparesis (GP) is a recognized complication following solid organ transplantation that may impact nutritional status, medication absorption, and overall outcomes. We aimed to quantify the pooled prevalence and incidence of GP, specifically after lung and heart transplantation. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2025 for studies reporting the prevalence or incidence of GP following lung or heart transplantation. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Using R statistical software, we conducted random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (Cis), stratified by transplant type. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. We conducted leave-one-out analysis, influence diagnostics, and examined publication bias using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Meta-regression explored the impact of age and sex. Results: Of the 1,255 initially identified studies, 25 studies with a total of 2,982 patients met the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening. Women constituted 1,308 (44.57%) of the total participants. The mean age was 45.8 ± 11.74. The overall prevalence of GP was 31.07% (95% CI 20.71-43.75%; I2 = 95.1%; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher prevalence of GP in combined lung and heart transplant recipients (40.22%; 95% CI 18.05-67.27%) compared to lung transplant only (27.29%; 95% CI 16.74-41.19%), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.3711). The overall incidence was 27.18% (95% CI 17.33-39.93%; I2 = 92.2%; P < 0.0001), with combined transplant recipients showing higher incidence (37.18%; 95% CI 23.21-53.69%) than lung transplant only (21.13%; 95% CI 10.59-37.73%; P = 0.1418). Sensitivity analyses through leave-one-out and influential case removal could not fully resolve the considerable heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between GP prevalence or incidence and patient age or sex. Egger's regression test indicated no significant publication bias for prevalence (P = 0.6698) or incidence (P = 0.4601) outcomes. Conclusion: This analysis highlighted the high prevalence of GP following lung or heart transplantation, occurring in approximately 31% of patients overall. Thus, standardized GP screening protocols before and after transplantation might be warranted.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.