Gravity-selected galaxy clusters: A tight mass-richness relation and an unclear Compton

This paper, the third in a series, investigates the scaling relations between optical richness, weak-lensing mass, and Compton Y for a sample of galaxy clusters selected purely by their gravitational effect on the shapes of background galaxies. This selection method is uncommon, as most cluster samples in the literature are selected based on signals originating from cluster baryons. We analyze a complete sample of 13 gravity-selected clusters at intermediate redshifts (with 0.12 ≤ zphot ≤ 0.40) with weak-lensing signal-to-noise ratios exceeding 7. We measured cluster richness by counting red-sequence galaxies, identifying two cases of line-of-sight projections in the process, later confirmed by spectroscopic data. Both clusters are sufficiently separated in redshift that richness contamination can be easily mitigated, since the two red sequences do not blend with each other. We find an exceptionally tight richness–mass relation using our red-sequence-based richness estimator, with a scatter of ∼0.05 dex, smaller than the intrinsic scatter of Compton Y with mass for the same sample. The lower scatter highlights the effectiveness of richness compared to Compton Y. No outliers are found in the richness-mass scaling, even when the cluster with a mass likely affected by projection effects is included in the sample. In the Compton Y-richness plane, the data do not delineate a clear trend. The limited sample size is not the sole reason for the unclear relation between Compton Y and richness, since the same sample, with identical richness values, exhibits a highly significant and tight mass-richness correlation.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555726/pdf
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gravity-selected galaxy clusters: A tight mass-richness relation and an unclear Compton

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Gravity-selected galaxy clusters: A tight mass-richness relation and an unclear Compton

article en

Abstract

This paper, the third in a series, investigates the scaling relations between optical richness, weak-lensing mass, and Compton Y for a sample of galaxy clusters selected purely by their gravitational effect on the shapes of background galaxies. This selection method is uncommon, as most cluster samples in the literature are selected based on signals originating from cluster baryons. We analyze a complete sample of 13 gravity-selected clusters at intermediate redshifts (with 0.12 ≤ zphot ≤ 0.40) with weak-lensing signal-to-noise ratios exceeding 7. We measured cluster richness by counting red-sequence galaxies, identifying two cases of line-of-sight projections in the process, later confirmed by spectroscopic data. Both clusters are sufficiently separated in redshift that richness contamination can be easily mitigated, since the two red sequences do not blend with each other. We find an exceptionally tight richness–mass relation using our red-sequence-based richness estimator, with a scatter of ∼0.05 dex, smaller than the intrinsic scatter of Compton Y with mass for the same sample. The lower scatter highlights the effectiveness of richness compared to Compton Y. No outliers are found in the richness-mass scaling, even when the cluster with a mass likely affected by projection effects is included in the sample. In the Compton Y-richness plane, the data do not delineate a clear trend. The limited sample size is not the sole reason for the unclear relation between Compton Y and richness, since the same sample, with identical richness values, exhibits a highly significant and tight mass-richness correlation.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gravity-selected galaxy clusters: A tight mass-richness relation and an unclear Compton · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS