Economic Analyses of COVID-19 Interventions: A Narrative Review of Global Evidence

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed an unprecedented global health and economic burden, prompting rapid implementation of diverse public health interventions. This review aimed to synthesize global evidence on the cost-effectiveness of key COVID-19 control strategies, including vaccination, testing, and social distancing and to identify methodological, contextual, and equity-related determinants of their economic value. <b>Methods:</b> A narrative literature review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies published between January 2020 and September 2025 and indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included economic evaluations and modeling analyses addressing COVID-19 interventions in healthcare, community, or educational settings. Data on costs, outcomes, and methodological features were extracted and synthesized descriptively. <b>Results:</b> Across 74 included studies, vaccination-particularly with messenger RNA (mRNA) platforms-emerged as the most cost-effective intervention across all settings, often cost-saving among high-risk populations. Combined or layered strategies integrating vaccination, testing, and selective social distancing consistently outperformed single interventions in both health and economic outcomes. Early and targeted implementation yielded the highest cost-effectiveness by preventing exponential transmission and healthcare overload. However, heterogeneity in modeling assumptions, analytic perspectives, and outcome measures limited comparability. Few studies applied extended or distributional cost-effectiveness frameworks to address equity, while indirect and long-term effects such as productivity losses and "long COVID" were frequently omitted. <b>Conclusions:</b> COVID-19 interventions are most efficient when early, targeted, and adaptive to local epidemiologic conditions. Integrating equity, methodological consistency, and broader societal impacts into future evaluations will strengthen evidence-based, economically sustainable pandemic preparedness and response strategies.