S3158 Emerging Disparities in Gastric Ulcer Perforation Mortality in the United States: A CDC WONDER Database Analysis (1999-2020)

Introduction: Gastric ulcer perforation is a life-threatening condition with high mortality, driven by delayed diagnosis, severe presentations, and complex surgical management. Yet national data on mortality trends remains limited, making it difficult to assess the full burden and associated disparities. Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data, this study examines U.S. trends and highlights high-risk populations through evaluation of demographic and geographic disparities. Methods: Using the CDC WONDER database, deaths attributed to ulcer perforations (K25.1-.2, .5-.6; K26.1-.2, .5-.6; K27.1-.2, .5-.6; K28.1-.2, .5-.6) were extracted for adults ≥25 years for identification of early onset trends that may be masked when focusing solely on older populations. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per million were calculated using the 2000 U.S. standard population. Joinpoint regression estimated annual percent changes (APCs), with significance defined by 95% confidence intervals (CI) excluding zero. Analyses followed STROBE guidelines. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 46,730 deaths (AAMR 9.71 per million), with an overall decline in mortality (APC -2.64; CI -3.45 to -1.78). Men had a higher AAMR than women (10.62 vs 8.95). Male mortality declined markedly (APC -6.09; CI -6.83 to -5.34) before a significant post-2010 increase (APC 1.36; CI 0.42-2.31). Female trends were more variable, with a brief non-significant period, followed by two significant declines (APC -8.69 and -3.14), and a notable increase post-2014 (APC 3.93; CI 1.84-6.05). Patients aged 80-84 had the highest crude mortality rate (57.15). Racial disparities were pronounced: non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest AAMR (9.85), followed by American Indian/Alaskan Natives (9.29) and NH Blacks (8.71); Hispanics had the lowest (5.93). Significant increases were observed among Hispanics after 2015 (APC 7.07; CI 1.27 to 13.2) with non-significant increases seen across all races. Regionally, the West had the highest AAMR (10.39), with the District of Columbia and Massachusetts marking the highest (16.50) and lowest (7.91) state-level AAMRs, respectively. Conclusion: While overall mortality from ulcer perforation has declined, demographic and geographic disparities, with significant recent increases, demonstrate its growing public health burden. Given its often nonspecific presentation and rapid progression, these findings call for renewed focus on timely recognition, risk stratification, and research in high-risk groups.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001140092.12471.1b
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3158 Emerging Disparities in Gastric Ulcer Perforation Mortality in the United States: A CDC WONDER Database Analysis (1999-2020)

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

S3158 Emerging Disparities in Gastric Ulcer Perforation Mortality in the United States: A CDC WONDER Database Analysis (1999-2020)

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric ulcer perforation is a life-threatening condition with high mortality, driven by delayed diagnosis, severe presentations, and complex surgical management. Yet national data on mortality trends remains limited, making it difficult to assess the full burden and associated disparities. Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data, this study examines U.S. trends and highlights high-risk populations through evaluation of demographic and geographic disparities. Methods: Using the CDC WONDER database, deaths attributed to ulcer perforations (K25.1-.2, .5-.6; K26.1-.2, .5-.6; K27.1-.2, .5-.6; K28.1-.2, .5-.6) were extracted for adults ≥25 years for identification of early onset trends that may be masked when focusing solely on older populations. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per million were calculated using the 2000 U.S. standard population. Joinpoint regression estimated annual percent changes (APCs), with significance defined by 95% confidence intervals (CI) excluding zero. Analyses followed STROBE guidelines. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 46,730 deaths (AAMR 9.71 per million), with an overall decline in mortality (APC -2.64; CI -3.45 to -1.78). Men had a higher AAMR than women (10.62 vs 8.95). Male mortality declined markedly (APC -6.09; CI -6.83 to -5.34) before a significant post-2010 increase (APC 1.36; CI 0.42-2.31). Female trends were more variable, with a brief non-significant period, followed by two significant declines (APC -8.69 and -3.14), and a notable increase post-2014 (APC 3.93; CI 1.84-6.05). Patients aged 80-84 had the highest crude mortality rate (57.15). Racial disparities were pronounced: non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest AAMR (9.85), followed by American Indian/Alaskan Natives (9.29) and NH Blacks (8.71); Hispanics had the lowest (5.93). Significant increases were observed among Hispanics after 2015 (APC 7.07; CI 1.27 to 13.2) with non-significant increases seen across all races. Regionally, the West had the highest AAMR (10.39), with the District of Columbia and Massachusetts marking the highest (16.50) and lowest (7.91) state-level AAMRs, respectively. Conclusion: While overall mortality from ulcer perforation has declined, demographic and geographic disparities, with significant recent increases, demonstrate its growing public health burden. Given its often nonspecific presentation and rapid progression, these findings call for renewed focus on timely recognition, risk stratification, and research in high-risk groups.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.