Protecting Community Rights in Ghana's Lithium Sector

This policy brief examines governance challenges in Ghana's expanding mining sector, through a case study of the Ewoyaa Lithium Project. Drawing on primary data from 12 semi-structured interviews and 3 focus group discussions conducted in 2024, alongside document analysis, significant failures in protecting community rights and livelihoods have been identified. The findings reveal three critical issues: (1) systematic non-enforcement of mining legislations and policies, (2) unfair compensation schemes enabled by legal ambiguities, and (3) community dispossession (ie the act of taking property, land, or natural resources away from a community or group of people) through legislative gaps between lease issuance and parliamentary ratification. The research demonstrates how these issues are enabled by governance shortcomings, thereby disproportionately benefiting mining companies whilst damaging local communities' economic stability. These shortcomings can be mitigated via the following policy recommendations contained in this Policy Brief.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17879576
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting Community Rights in Ghana's Lithium Sector

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mining and Resource Management
article

Protecting Community Rights in Ghana's Lithium Sector

article en

Abstract

This policy brief examines governance challenges in Ghana's expanding mining sector, through a case study of the Ewoyaa Lithium Project. Drawing on primary data from 12 semi-structured interviews and 3 focus group discussions conducted in 2024, alongside document analysis, significant failures in protecting community rights and livelihoods have been identified. The findings reveal three critical issues: (1) systematic non-enforcement of mining legislations and policies, (2) unfair compensation schemes enabled by legal ambiguities, and (3) community dispossession (ie the act of taking property, land, or natural resources away from a community or group of people) through legislative gaps between lease issuance and parliamentary ratification. The research demonstrates how these issues are enabled by governance shortcomings, thereby disproportionately benefiting mining companies whilst damaging local communities' economic stability. These shortcomings can be mitigated via the following policy recommendations contained in this Policy Brief.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Protecting Community Rights in Ghana's Lithium Sector · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS