Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Non-Descent Uterus for Treatment of Benign Uterine Diseases

Background: Hysterectomy is the most well-known carried out major gynecological procedure and the choice relies upon signs for activity, specialist's preparation and inclination, uterine size, adnexal pathologies and patient decision. Aim of the work: For the purpose of contrasting the results of vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of benign uterine disorders in women whose uteruses have not yet descended. Patients and Methods: This was prospective randomized comparative study, directed on 100 patients with suggestive uterine harmless sores whom was partitioned into two gatherings: (Group 1); remembered 50 patients for whom absolute laparoscopic hysterectomy were finished, (Gathering 2); remembered 50 patients for whom vaginal hysterectomy with non-drop uterus were finished at Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Azhar College emergency clinics, Egypt. Result: In terms of postoperative hemoglobin levels and blood loss, the two groups were significantly different. In terms of operating times, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative problems, neither group differed significantly from the other. Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy should be the treatment of choice for benign gynecologic diseases when both vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy are available.