S2878 Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension and Provider Initiation of Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Therapy

Introduction: Portal hypertension is a major complication of cirrhosis, increasing the risk of variceal bleeding, ascites, and encephalopathy. Noninvasive markers such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet count are now used to guide non-selective beta blocker (NSBB) therapy, as outlined by AASLD criteria and Baveno VII consensus. We aimed to assess adherence to these criteria at our institution and identify opportunities to improve NSBB prescribing. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all Fibroscan results from January first, 2024 to May 14th, 2025, and identified patients with LSM ≥15 kPa. Platelet counts within 3 months before or after the Fibroscan were collected. Patients were grouped according to guideline-based NSBB indication: LSM 15–19.9 kPa with platelet count <110 K/mm3 (group 1), LSM 20–24.9 kPa with platelet count <150 K/mm3 (group 2), and LSM ≥25 kPa irrespective of platelet count (group 3). NSBB prescription status and reasons for non-prescription were recorded. Results: Among 124 patients who met noninvasive criteria for NSBB, 50 (40%) were prescribed an NSBB, 13 (10%) were intentionally not prescribed an NSBB due to intolerance or status post-TIPS, 16 (13%) were on a selective beta blocker, and 45 (36%) were not on any beta blocker. Combining NSBB prescriptions and intentional non-prescriptions, 63 patients (51%) were managed with guideline-concordant care. When stratified by group, group 1 (n = 8) had 38% guideline-concordant care (3 on an NSBB), group 2 (n = 19) had 74% guideline-concordant care (11 on an NSBB, 3 intentionally not on an NSBB), and group 3 (n = 97) had 47% guideline-concordant care (36 on an NSBB, 10 intentionally not on an NSBB). Lack of documentation, awaiting EGD or repeat Fibroscan, and missed or no scheduled follow-up accounted for cases of non-adherence to guidelines. Conclusion: Adherence to NSBB initiation can be improved at our institution, with many eligible patients not prescribed NSBB without documented rationale. Outdated reliance on further invasive testing and missed or no scheduled follow-up contribute to non-adherence. Improved provider education and systematic prompts may enhance guideline-based NSBB prescribing and preventive care in portal hypertension.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001138972.85725.d6
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2878 Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension and Provider Initiation of Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Therapy

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S2878 Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension and Provider Initiation of Non-Selective Beta-Blocker Therapy

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Portal hypertension is a major complication of cirrhosis, increasing the risk of variceal bleeding, ascites, and encephalopathy. Noninvasive markers such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet count are now used to guide non-selective beta blocker (NSBB) therapy, as outlined by AASLD criteria and Baveno VII consensus. We aimed to assess adherence to these criteria at our institution and identify opportunities to improve NSBB prescribing. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all Fibroscan results from January first, 2024 to May 14th, 2025, and identified patients with LSM ≥15 kPa. Platelet counts within 3 months before or after the Fibroscan were collected. Patients were grouped according to guideline-based NSBB indication: LSM 15–19.9 kPa with platelet count <110 K/mm3 (group 1), LSM 20–24.9 kPa with platelet count <150 K/mm3 (group 2), and LSM ≥25 kPa irrespective of platelet count (group 3). NSBB prescription status and reasons for non-prescription were recorded. Results: Among 124 patients who met noninvasive criteria for NSBB, 50 (40%) were prescribed an NSBB, 13 (10%) were intentionally not prescribed an NSBB due to intolerance or status post-TIPS, 16 (13%) were on a selective beta blocker, and 45 (36%) were not on any beta blocker. Combining NSBB prescriptions and intentional non-prescriptions, 63 patients (51%) were managed with guideline-concordant care. When stratified by group, group 1 (n = 8) had 38% guideline-concordant care (3 on an NSBB), group 2 (n = 19) had 74% guideline-concordant care (11 on an NSBB, 3 intentionally not on an NSBB), and group 3 (n = 97) had 47% guideline-concordant care (36 on an NSBB, 10 intentionally not on an NSBB). Lack of documentation, awaiting EGD or repeat Fibroscan, and missed or no scheduled follow-up accounted for cases of non-adherence to guidelines. Conclusion: Adherence to NSBB initiation can be improved at our institution, with many eligible patients not prescribed NSBB without documented rationale. Outdated reliance on further invasive testing and missed or no scheduled follow-up contribute to non-adherence. Improved provider education and systematic prompts may enhance guideline-based NSBB prescribing and preventive care in portal hypertension.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.