S2933 Sociodemographic Disparities in Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in US Adults

Introduction: Liver stiffness and steatosis, assessed via transient elastography, are non-invasive markers used to evaluate hepatic fibrosis and fat accumulation. This study aims to examine differences in liver stiffness and steatosis across sociodemographic groups. Methods: Data were drawn from the NHANES 2017–2020 cycles, a nationally representative survey of the U.S. population conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Participants aged 18 and older who underwent transient elastography using FibroScan were included. Liver stiffness measurements (LSM, kPa) and controlled attenuation parameters (CAP, dB/m) were used as indicators of fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation for continuous variables and ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey HSD for group comparisons. Results: A total of 8,317 participants were included (50.3% woman, 34.2% non-Hispanic White, and the mean age was 49 years). Men had higher median liver stiffness (6.45 kPa) and CAP (270.99 dB/m) than women (5.58 kPa and 256.56 dB/m, respectively), with both differences statistically significant (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with liver stiffness (r = 0.079, P < 0.001) and CAP (r = 0.183, P < 0.001). Post hoc HSD tests showed that non-Hispanic Asians had significantly lower mean liver stiffness compared to other racial groups (P < 0.05), except for Mexican Americans. Additionally, Mexican Americans had significantly higher steatosis scores (280.21 dB/m) than all other racial groups (P < 0.05). Participants with health insurance had slightly higher median liver stiffness compared to those without insurance (6.06 vs 5.79 kPa, P = 0.049). Although median CAP values were also higher among insured individuals (264.25 vs 261.08 dB/m), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Post hoc HSD tests showed that participants with full food security had significantly lower liver stiffness than those with very low food security (5.89 vs 6.46 kPa, P = 0.037), with no significant differences between other food security levels. Steatosis scores did not differ significantly across food security groups (P = 0.098). The family monthly poverty index was not significantly associated with liver stiffness (r = –0.022, P = 0.07) or CAP scores (r = 0.003, P = 0.787). Conclusion: Liver stiffness and steatosis differed by gender, race, and food security status. These findings suggest sociodemographic factors may influence liver health outcomes in U.S. adults.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139192.35129.2c
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S2933 Sociodemographic Disparities in Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in US Adults

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S2933 Sociodemographic Disparities in Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in US Adults

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Liver stiffness and steatosis, assessed via transient elastography, are non-invasive markers used to evaluate hepatic fibrosis and fat accumulation. This study aims to examine differences in liver stiffness and steatosis across sociodemographic groups. Methods: Data were drawn from the NHANES 2017–2020 cycles, a nationally representative survey of the U.S. population conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Participants aged 18 and older who underwent transient elastography using FibroScan were included. Liver stiffness measurements (LSM, kPa) and controlled attenuation parameters (CAP, dB/m) were used as indicators of fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation for continuous variables and ANOVA tests with post hoc Tukey HSD for group comparisons. Results: A total of 8,317 participants were included (50.3% woman, 34.2% non-Hispanic White, and the mean age was 49 years). Men had higher median liver stiffness (6.45 kPa) and CAP (270.99 dB/m) than women (5.58 kPa and 256.56 dB/m, respectively), with both differences statistically significant (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with liver stiffness (r = 0.079, P < 0.001) and CAP (r = 0.183, P < 0.001). Post hoc HSD tests showed that non-Hispanic Asians had significantly lower mean liver stiffness compared to other racial groups (P < 0.05), except for Mexican Americans. Additionally, Mexican Americans had significantly higher steatosis scores (280.21 dB/m) than all other racial groups (P < 0.05). Participants with health insurance had slightly higher median liver stiffness compared to those without insurance (6.06 vs 5.79 kPa, P = 0.049). Although median CAP values were also higher among insured individuals (264.25 vs 261.08 dB/m), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Post hoc HSD tests showed that participants with full food security had significantly lower liver stiffness than those with very low food security (5.89 vs 6.46 kPa, P = 0.037), with no significant differences between other food security levels. Steatosis scores did not differ significantly across food security groups (P = 0.098). The family monthly poverty index was not significantly associated with liver stiffness (r = –0.022, P = 0.07) or CAP scores (r = 0.003, P = 0.787). Conclusion: Liver stiffness and steatosis differed by gender, race, and food security status. These findings suggest sociodemographic factors may influence liver health outcomes in U.S. adults.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.