Affordable 3D Technologies for Contactless Cattle Morphometry: A Comparative Pilot Trial of Smartphone-Based LiDAR, Photogrammetry and Neural Surface Reconstruction Models
Morphometric traits are closely linked to body condition, health, welfare, and productivity in livestock. In recent years, contactless 3D reconstruction technologies have been increasingly adopted to improve the accuracy and efficiency of morphometric evaluations. Conventional approaches for 3D reconstruction mainly employ Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) or photogrammetry. In contrast, emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methods, such as Neural Surface Reconstruction, 3D Gaussian Splatting, and Neural Radiance Fields, offer new opportunities for high-fidelity digital modeling. Smartphones’ affordability represents a cost-effective and portable platform for deploying these advanced tools, potentially supporting enhanced agricultural performance, accelerating sector digitalization, and thus reducing the urban–rural digital gap. This preliminary study assessed the viability of using smartphone-based LiDAR, photogrammetry, and AI models to obtain body measurements of Marchigiana cattle. Five morphometric traits manually collected on animals were compared with those extracted from smartphone-based 3D reconstructions. LiDAR measurements offer more consistent estimates, with relative error ranging from −1.55% to 4.28%, while photogrammetry demonstrated accuracy ranging from 0.75 to −14.56. AI-based models (NSR, 3DGS, NeRF) reported more variability between accuracy results, pointing to the need for further refinement. Overall, the results highlight the preliminary potential of portable 3D scanning technologies, particularly LiDAR-equipped smartphones, for non-invasive morphometric data collection in cattle.
Institutions
- Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
- Southwest University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Agriculture
- Published
- 2025-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15242567
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.35