Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 6: Impacts on meal quality

This article constitutes the sixth part of a series dedicated to the comparative analysis of extraction solvents for oilseeds. This section examines the effects of various solvent extraction methods on the quality of oilseed meals, particularly focusing on antinutritional factors and protein value. The study discusses the impact of these solvents on glucosinolates (GLS) in rapeseed meal, trypsin inhibitors in soybean meal, phytic acid and phosphorus digestibility, gossypol in cottonseed, and phenolic compounds. Alternative solvents with higher water miscibility may lead to more effective reduction of GLS in rapeseed meal due to increased moisture in the desolventizer. They also could denature trypsin inhibitors in soybeans before desolventization, but this effect is negligible due to sufficient toasting conditions in the desolventizer. The intensity of heat treatment can affect phosphorus digestibility, but this intensification often comes with undesirable effects on protein digestibility. For cottonseed, ethanol with added acids has been shown to be able to extract gossypol, while isopropanol was less effective. Phenolic compound extraction with more polar solvents has the potential to improve meal taste and appearance, but without major effect on the feed value of the proteins. Desolventization conditions significantly impact protein value, with mild cooking potentially improving digestibility, while excessive heat treatment can lead to Maillard reactions, reducing protein and the digestibility of sensitive amino acids. Non-hexane solvents have water miscibility, latent heat of vapourisation and solvent hold-up in the marc that lead to increasing the temperature, moisture and residence time required for effective desolventization likely to promote stronger reduction in protein digestibility. Further experimental data would be necessary to better assess this issue.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2025009/pdf
Primary Topic
Proteins in Food Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 6: Impacts on meal quality

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Proteins in Food Systems
article

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 6: Impacts on meal quality

article en

Abstract

This article constitutes the sixth part of a series dedicated to the comparative analysis of extraction solvents for oilseeds. This section examines the effects of various solvent extraction methods on the quality of oilseed meals, particularly focusing on antinutritional factors and protein value. The study discusses the impact of these solvents on glucosinolates (GLS) in rapeseed meal, trypsin inhibitors in soybean meal, phytic acid and phosphorus digestibility, gossypol in cottonseed, and phenolic compounds. Alternative solvents with higher water miscibility may lead to more effective reduction of GLS in rapeseed meal due to increased moisture in the desolventizer. They also could denature trypsin inhibitors in soybeans before desolventization, but this effect is negligible due to sufficient toasting conditions in the desolventizer. The intensity of heat treatment can affect phosphorus digestibility, but this intensification often comes with undesirable effects on protein digestibility. For cottonseed, ethanol with added acids has been shown to be able to extract gossypol, while isopropanol was less effective. Phenolic compound extraction with more polar solvents has the potential to improve meal taste and appearance, but without major effect on the feed value of the proteins. Desolventization conditions significantly impact protein value, with mild cooking potentially improving digestibility, while excessive heat treatment can lead to Maillard reactions, reducing protein and the digestibility of sensitive amino acids. Non-hexane solvents have water miscibility, latent heat of vapourisation and solvent hold-up in the marc that lead to increasing the temperature, moisture and residence time required for effective desolventization likely to promote stronger reduction in protein digestibility. Further experimental data would be necessary to better assess this issue.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Proteins in Food Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 6: Impacts on meal quality · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS