Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT)

Abstract This paper reports on a study exploring students’ engagement with the project Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT). With the aim to provide insights into how we can better engage students, ensuring that future virtual exchanges are more inclusive, this paper focuses on the behavioural, cognitive, and affective engagement dimensions in an exchange utilising English as an International Language (EIL). VEELT involved 53 undergraduate and postgraduate students on English education courses in the UK, Mexico and Spain whose mother tongue was not English and who interacted both synchronously and asynchronously on topics relating to their ELT syllabus in their respective higher education (HE) institutions. The three distinctive features of this paper are: its focus on the three above mentioned engagement dimensions; the discussion relating to English as an International Language (EIL) in VEs and the involvement of students who were trained as e-mediators in Zoom breakout rooms in facilitating the VE task completion. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to analyse the impact of the VE on the students’ ELT learning journey and their levels of engagement with the VE. While the students’ evaluation of their VEELT experience was positive on the whole, a number of engagement and inclusion challenges were identified. Findings indicate that affective engagement is central to successful participation in VEs, and that strategies such as multilingual introductions, peer mediation, and co-created content can foster more inclusive and equitable learning experiences.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AILA Review
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24042.che
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT)

AILA Review
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT)

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports on a study exploring students’ engagement with the project Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT). With the aim to provide insights into how we can better engage students, ensuring that future virtual exchanges are more inclusive, this paper focuses on the behavioural, cognitive, and affective engagement dimensions in an exchange utilising English as an International Language (EIL). VEELT involved 53 undergraduate and postgraduate students on English education courses in the UK, Mexico and Spain whose mother tongue was not English and who interacted both synchronously and asynchronously on topics relating to their ELT syllabus in their respective higher education (HE) institutions. The three distinctive features of this paper are: its focus on the three above mentioned engagement dimensions; the discussion relating to English as an International Language (EIL) in VEs and the involvement of students who were trained as e-mediators in Zoom breakout rooms in facilitating the VE task completion. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to analyse the impact of the VE on the students’ ELT learning journey and their levels of engagement with the VE. While the students’ evaluation of their VEELT experience was positive on the whole, a number of engagement and inclusion challenges were identified. Findings indicate that affective engagement is central to successful participation in VEs, and that strategies such as multilingual introductions, peer mediation, and co-created content can foster more inclusive and equitable learning experiences.

AILA ReviewVol. 38(2)
Xi'an International Studies University (CN), Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas (MX), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.