S3103 Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Survival Outcomes Differ Across Morphological Subtypes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE): A Retrospective Comparative Study

Introduction: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) presents in morphologic subtypes—linear, diffuse, and nodular—with unclear differences in outcomes. This study evaluates subtype-specific differences in demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, transfusion needs, treatment patterns, and overall survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients with endoscopically confirmed GAVE divided by subtype: linear (n = 80), diffuse (n = 10), and nodular (n = 30). Demographics, GI symptoms, comorbidities, treatment modalities, transfusion burden, and survival were compared using chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes included symptom burden, transfusion burden, and treatment approach. Results: Age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities did not significantly differ among GAVE subtypes. Mortality was highest in the diffuse group (80%) compared to linear (35%) and nodular (53.3%) (P = 0.011). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in median survival by subtype: 279.5 days (approximately 0.8 years) for diffuse; 1,249 days (approximately 3.4 years) for nodular; and 2,348 days (approximately 6.4 years) for linear (P < 0.001). Upper GI symptoms were infrequently noted overall (9.2%), with symptoms documented only in the linear and nodular groups. Transfusion burden varied significantly across subtypes, with the diffuse group having the highest percentage of patients requiring transfusion (60.0% vs 48.8% for linear and 46.7% for nodular; P = 0.046). Among those who were transfused, mean transfusion requirements differed significantly by subtype, with the diffuse group exhibiting the highest burden (9.3 units), compared to 2.8 units in the linear group and 3.5 units in the nodular group (P = 0.006). About half of patients underwent endoscopic therapy with modalities differing among groups: Endoscopic band ligation was more commonly utilized in the nodular group (P < 0.001), while argon plasma coagulation and radiofrequency ablation usage did not differ significantly (P = 0.432 and P = 0.115, respectively), consistent with published recommendations. Conclusion: Despite similar demographic and comorbidity profiles, survival and transfusion needs differed markedly by GAVE subtype. Diffuse GAVE was associated with significantly shorter survival and a higher transfusion burden. Morphologic subtype provides prognostic value and should inform patient counseling.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001139872.34373.b1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3103 Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Survival Outcomes Differ Across Morphological Subtypes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE): A Retrospective Comparative Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S3103 Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Survival Outcomes Differ Across Morphological Subtypes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE): A Retrospective Comparative Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) presents in morphologic subtypes—linear, diffuse, and nodular—with unclear differences in outcomes. This study evaluates subtype-specific differences in demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, transfusion needs, treatment patterns, and overall survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients with endoscopically confirmed GAVE divided by subtype: linear (n = 80), diffuse (n = 10), and nodular (n = 30). Demographics, GI symptoms, comorbidities, treatment modalities, transfusion burden, and survival were compared using chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes included symptom burden, transfusion burden, and treatment approach. Results: Age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities did not significantly differ among GAVE subtypes. Mortality was highest in the diffuse group (80%) compared to linear (35%) and nodular (53.3%) (P = 0.011). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in median survival by subtype: 279.5 days (approximately 0.8 years) for diffuse; 1,249 days (approximately 3.4 years) for nodular; and 2,348 days (approximately 6.4 years) for linear (P < 0.001). Upper GI symptoms were infrequently noted overall (9.2%), with symptoms documented only in the linear and nodular groups. Transfusion burden varied significantly across subtypes, with the diffuse group having the highest percentage of patients requiring transfusion (60.0% vs 48.8% for linear and 46.7% for nodular; P = 0.046). Among those who were transfused, mean transfusion requirements differed significantly by subtype, with the diffuse group exhibiting the highest burden (9.3 units), compared to 2.8 units in the linear group and 3.5 units in the nodular group (P = 0.006). About half of patients underwent endoscopic therapy with modalities differing among groups: Endoscopic band ligation was more commonly utilized in the nodular group (P < 0.001), while argon plasma coagulation and radiofrequency ablation usage did not differ significantly (P = 0.432 and P = 0.115, respectively), consistent with published recommendations. Conclusion: Despite similar demographic and comorbidity profiles, survival and transfusion needs differed markedly by GAVE subtype. Diffuse GAVE was associated with significantly shorter survival and a higher transfusion burden. Morphologic subtype provides prognostic value and should inform patient counseling.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.