Firm-level nature dependence

We construct firm-level measures of dependence on ecosystem services (NatureDep scores) for 31,772 listed firms in 117 countries between 2010 and 2023, combining the ENCORE database with firm-level revenue information. The scores capture exposure to physical nature risks, with financial effects additionally depending on the deterioration of ecosystem services. NatureDep scores positively correlate with impact on biodiversity, are unrelated to nature-related actions disclosed in the CDP survey, are not reflected in firms’ corporate disclosures, and predict BlackRock’s biodiversity-related engagements. We employ the scores in two applications. First, the scores relate positively to measures of downside risk, with effects stemming mostly from high dependencies on water-related ecosystem services. Second, the scores predict nature-related incidents that arise when high nature dependence leads firms to damage nature, overuse resources, or trigger disputes with local communities. We conclude that investors started to pay attention to nature dependence, while corporate action and disclosure remain limited.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280864
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firm-level nature dependence

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Firm-level nature dependence

article en

Abstract

We construct firm-level measures of dependence on ecosystem services (NatureDep scores) for 31,772 listed firms in 117 countries between 2010 and 2023, combining the ENCORE database with firm-level revenue information. The scores capture exposure to physical nature risks, with financial effects additionally depending on the deterioration of ecosystem services. NatureDep scores positively correlate with impact on biodiversity, are unrelated to nature-related actions disclosed in the CDP survey, are not reflected in firms’ corporate disclosures, and predict BlackRock’s biodiversity-related engagements. We employ the scores in two applications. First, the scores relate positively to measures of downside risk, with effects stemming mostly from high dependencies on water-related ecosystem services. Second, the scores predict nature-related incidents that arise when high nature dependence leads firms to damage nature, overuse resources, or trigger disputes with local communities. We conclude that investors started to pay attention to nature dependence, while corporate action and disclosure remain limited.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.