Tracing the biologistic ability paradigm in Danish special education: a historical inquiry into three Danish welfare state contexts, 1923–2023

This article explores the role of the biologistic ability paradigm in Danish special education across three historical contexts (1923–2023). It examines how biologistic notions of intelligence and ability have shaped educational policies and practices within the Danish welfare state. Using a diachronic and comparative approach, the study highlights shifts in how special education has been used to classify, optimise, and manage population diversity. It discusses the influence of psychology, psychiatry, and IQ testing in shaping student differentiation and governance. The article argues that contemporary policies on gifted education and intelligence screening reflect a reconfiguration of biologistic reasoning, aligning with broader shifts toward competitiveness and individual optimisation in education. Ultimately, it demonstrates how biologistic ability paradigms have evolved as tools of governance, influencing both inclusivity and exclusion within the educational system.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-281131
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the biologistic ability paradigm in Danish special education: a historical inquiry into three Danish welfare state contexts, 1923–2023

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Tracing the biologistic ability paradigm in Danish special education: a historical inquiry into three Danish welfare state contexts, 1923–2023

article en

Abstract

This article explores the role of the biologistic ability paradigm in Danish special education across three historical contexts (1923–2023). It examines how biologistic notions of intelligence and ability have shaped educational policies and practices within the Danish welfare state. Using a diachronic and comparative approach, the study highlights shifts in how special education has been used to classify, optimise, and manage population diversity. It discusses the influence of psychology, psychiatry, and IQ testing in shaping student differentiation and governance. The article argues that contemporary policies on gifted education and intelligence screening reflect a reconfiguration of biologistic reasoning, aligning with broader shifts toward competitiveness and individual optimisation in education. Ultimately, it demonstrates how biologistic ability paradigms have evolved as tools of governance, influencing both inclusivity and exclusion within the educational system.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.